G2TT
来源类型Journal Article
规范类型其他
Measuring Procedural Justice and Legitimacy at the Local Level
其他题名The Police-Community Interaction Survey
Dennis P Rosenbaum; Daniel Lawrence; Susan M Hartnett; Jack McDevitt; Chad Posick
发表日期2015-09-01
出版年2015
语种英语
概述Objectives: To introduce and evaluate the Police–Citizen Interaction (PCI) Survey, the electronic survey component of the National Police Research Platform, designed to measure the quality of police–citizen encounters at the local level.Methods: Three studies tested the feasibility, validity, and sample representativeness of the PCI Survey. A randomized control trial (RCT) compared the PCI Survey
摘要

Objectives: To introduce and evaluate the Police–Citizen Interaction (PCI) Survey, the electronic survey component of the National Police Research Platform, designed to measure the quality of police–citizen encounters at the local level.

Methods: Three studies tested the feasibility, validity, and sample representativeness of the PCI Survey. A randomized control trial (RCT) compared the PCI Survey results with the most widely used survey method, the telephone survey. The primary measures were the community member’s satisfaction with the contact, judgments of procedural justice during the interaction, police effectiveness, and police legitimacy.

Results: The RCT revealed no significant differences between the PCI Survey and the standard telephone survey, thus increasing confidence in the validity of the PCI methodology. The PCI Survey was able to replicate “known group” findings from prior research; capture agency-level differences in public satisfaction; uncover complex interactions of race, type of incident and procedural justice; and show the relative importance of both process and outcome during police-initiated contacts.

Conclusions: The PCI Survey approach, utilizing web and voice interactive methods, shows considerable promise as a tool for measuring organizational performance in new ways, focusing on procedural fairness and the quality of police services rather than the reliance on crime statistics. The survey appears to have utility for local jurisdictions, while at the same time providing standard metrics for cross-jurisdictional theory testing and benchmarking. The survey was tested initially with three agencies of different sizes. It will be refined for implementation on a larger scale.

Click here to read the publication (Leaving Urban's website)

主题Crime and Justice
URLhttps://www.urban.org/research/publication/measuring-procedural-justice-and-legitimacy-local-level
来源智库Urban Institute (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/478997
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Dennis P Rosenbaum,Daniel Lawrence,Susan M Hartnett,et al. Measuring Procedural Justice and Legitimacy at the Local Level. 2015.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Dennis P Rosenbaum]的文章
[Daniel Lawrence]的文章
[Susan M Hartnett]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Dennis P Rosenbaum]的文章
[Daniel Lawrence]的文章
[Susan M Hartnett]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Dennis P Rosenbaum]的文章
[Daniel Lawrence]的文章
[Susan M Hartnett]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。