Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Journal Article |
规范类型 | 其他 |
Financing Long-Term Services and Supports: Options Reflect Trade-Offs for Older Americans and Federal Spending | |
Melissa M. Favreault; Howard Gleckman; Richard W. Johnson | |
发表日期 | 2015-11-20 |
出版年 | 2015 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | About half of older Americans will need substantial, prolonged help with routine activities. Most people pay out of pocket for these long-term services and supports until they exhaust their financial resources and go onto Medicaid. To show how policy changes could expand insurance’s role in financing these needs, we model several new insurance options. If the primary goal is to significantly increase insurance |
摘要 | About half of older Americans will need substantial, prolonged help with routine activities. Most people pay out of pocket for these long-term services and supports until they exhaust their financial resources and go onto Medicaid. To show how policy changes could expand insurance’s role in financing these needs, we model several new insurance options. If the primary goal is to significantly increase insurance coverage, mandatory options would be more successful than voluntary versions. If the primary goal is to reduce Medicaid costs, options that cover long-term services and supports relatively late in the disability spell would be most beneficial.
|
主题 | Aging ; Health and Health Policy |
URL | https://www.urban.org/research/publication/financing-long-term-services-and-supports-options-reflect-trade-offs-older-americans-and-federal-spending |
来源智库 | Urban Institute (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/479092 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Melissa M. Favreault,Howard Gleckman,Richard W. Johnson. Financing Long-Term Services and Supports: Options Reflect Trade-Offs for Older Americans and Federal Spending. 2015. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。