Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Brief |
规范类型 | 简报 |
How Much Might New Insurance Programs Improve Financing for Long-Term Services and Supports? | |
Melissa M. Favreault; Howard Gleckman; Richard W. Johnson | |
发表日期 | 2016-02-08 |
出版年 | 2016 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | For decades, policymakers have struggled to address the challenges of financing long-term services and supports, with little success. To better understand new insurance-based alternatives and their effects on people age 65 and older, we analyze several proposals, including mandatory and voluntary options. Although none of these new plans is ideal, each would be an improvement over today’s ineffective financing |
摘要 | For decades, policymakers have struggled to address the challenges of financing long-term services and supports, with little success. To better understand new insurance-based alternatives and their effects on people age 65 and older, we analyze several proposals, including mandatory and voluntary options. Although none of these new plans is ideal, each would be an improvement over today’s ineffective financing system, which imposes large out-of-pocket costs on families and shifts costs to the underfunded Medicaid system once those families have exhausted their financial resources. We find substantial trade-offs between voluntary and mandatory insurance and smaller but important differences among voluntary programs.
|
主题 | Aging ; Health and Health Policy |
URL | https://www.urban.org/research/publication/how-much-might-new-insurance-programs-improve-financing-long-term-services-and-supports |
来源智库 | Urban Institute (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/479172 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Melissa M. Favreault,Howard Gleckman,Richard W. Johnson. How Much Might New Insurance Programs Improve Financing for Long-Term Services and Supports?. 2016. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
2000602-How-Much-Mig(190KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。