Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Research Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
Tuition and State Appropriations | |
其他题名 | Using Evidence and Logic to Gain Perspective |
Sandy Baum; Michael McPherson; Breno Braga; Sarah Minton | |
发表日期 | 2018-02-28 |
出版年 | 2018 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | This brief reviews both the empirical evidence and the reasoning behind differing views of the relationship between changes in state appropriations for higher education and changes in public university tuition and expenditures. We conclude that the weight of evidence indicates that appropriation changes have a significant impact on tuition decisions. However, the size of the response varies across types of |
摘要 | This brief reviews both the empirical evidence and the reasoning behind differing views of the relationship between changes in state appropriations for higher education and changes in public university tuition and expenditures. We conclude that the weight of evidence indicates that appropriation changes have a significant impact on tuition decisions. However, the size of the response varies across types of institutions, depending on their pool of applicants and available options for responding to appropriation changes. Moreover, the overall relationship is not as strong as many people suppose. This brief was updated in March 2018 to reflect a change in how we compare the five studies we discuss in the second full paragraph on page 16. |
主题 | Education and Training |
URL | https://www.urban.org/research/publication/tuition-and-state-appropriations |
来源智库 | Urban Institute (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/480112 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Sandy Baum,Michael McPherson,Breno Braga,et al. Tuition and State Appropriations. 2018. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
2018_03_08_tuition_a(457KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。