| 来源类型 | Brief |
| 规范类型 | 简报 |
| How Different Studies Measure Income Inequality | |
| 其他题名 | Piketty and Saez Are Not the Only Game in Town |
| Stephen Rose | |
| 发表日期 | 2018-12-04 |
| 出版年 | 2018 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 概述 | Though measuring inequality seems straightforward and uncontroversial, methodological issues greatly affect findings. This brief presents the intricacies of several income inequality studies and explains their different results. Researchers’ estimates of income inequality differ significantly because they use different units of analysis, definitions of income, adjustments for family size, capital income measures |
| 摘要 | Though measuring inequality seems straightforward and uncontroversial, methodological issues greatly affect findings. This brief presents the intricacies of several income inequality studies and explains their different results. Researchers’ estimates of income inequality differ significantly because they use different units of analysis, definitions of income, adjustments for family size, capital income measures (if any), and adjustments for inflation.
|
| 主题 | Income and Wealth |
| URL | https://www.urban.org/research/publication/how-different-studies-measure-income-inequality |
| 来源智库 | Urban Institute (United States) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/480422 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Stephen Rose. How Different Studies Measure Income Inequality. 2018. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| how_different_studie（244KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Stephen Rose]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Stephen Rose]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Stephen Rose]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
