Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Brief |
规范类型 | 简报 |
Assessing Feasibility Studies | |
其他题名 | Understanding Feasibility Studies for Pay for Success and Outcomes-Based Financing |
Daniel Teles; Kassie Scott | |
发表日期 | 2019-10-02 |
出版年 | 2019 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | Pay for success (PFS) shifts the risk of funding a program from traditional funders (usually a government) to investors that are repaid if the intervention achieves predetermined outcomes. PFS doesn’t work for all programs or in all contexts (Milner et al. 2016). At a minimum, practitioners need to decide whether expected outcomes can be measured and agree upon a performance threshold for repayment. Effectively |
摘要 | Pay for success (PFS) shifts the risk of funding a program from traditional funders (usually a government) to investors that are repaid if the intervention achieves predetermined outcomes. PFS doesn’t work for all programs or in all contexts (Milner et al. 2016). At a minimum, practitioners need to decide whether expected outcomes can be measured and agree upon a performance threshold for repayment. Effectively addressing these two factors is a complex process, which is why it is common to begin any proposed PFS project with a feasibility study. Related project page: |
主题 | Pay for Success ; Nonprofits and Philanthropy |
URL | https://www.urban.org/research/publication/assessing-feasibility-studies |
来源智库 | Urban Institute (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/480757 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Daniel Teles,Kassie Scott. Assessing Feasibility Studies. 2019. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
accessing_feasibilit(291KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Daniel Teles]的文章 |
[Kassie Scott]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Daniel Teles]的文章 |
[Kassie Scott]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Daniel Teles]的文章 |
[Kassie Scott]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。