Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Publication |
来源ID | Trends in Education Research, Issue Brief #1 |
Quality in the Classroom: How Does Teach For America Measure Up? | |
Paul T. Decker; Daniel P. Mayer,; Steven Glazerman | |
发表日期 | 2004-08-30 |
出版者 | Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research |
出版年 | 2004 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | This four-page issue brief summarizes findings from Mathematica\u0027s evaluation of Teach For America. The researchers found that TFA teachers outperformed non-TFA teachers in the same schools in math and achieved the same results in reading.", |
摘要 | This four-page issue brief summarizes findings from Mathematica's evaluation of Teach For America. The researchers found that TFA teachers outperformed non-TFA teachers in the same schools in math and achieved the same results in reading. However, TFA teachers also reported greater challenges in managing their classrooms. TFA and non-TFA teachers had very different educational and teacher preparation backgrounds, with TFA teachers generally coming from more competitive undergraduate backgrounds but with less formal teacher training. However, non-TFA teachers came from a diversity of backgrounds and preparation, with many entering the profession without substantial teacher training. |
区域 | National Evaluation of Teach For America |
URL | https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/quality-in-the-classroom-how-does-teach-for-america-measure-up |
来源智库 | Mathematica Policy Research (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/485268 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Paul T. Decker,Daniel P. Mayer,,Steven Glazerman. Quality in the Classroom: How Does Teach For America Measure Up?. 2004. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
qualclass.pdf(152KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。