Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Publication |
来源ID | Journal Article |
The Truncation-by-Death Problem: What to Do in an Experimental Evaluation When the Outcome Is Not Always Defined | |
Sheena McConnell; Elizabeth A. Stuart,; Barbara Devaney | |
发表日期 | 2008-04-30 |
出版者 | Evaluation Review, vol. 32, no. 2 |
出版年 | 2008 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | Although experiments are viewed as the gold standard for evaluation, some of their benefits may be lost when, as is common, outcomes are not defined for some sample members. ", |
摘要 | Although experiments are viewed as the gold standard for evaluation, some of their benefits may be lost when, as is common, outcomes are not defined for some sample members. In evaluations of marriage interventions, for example, a key outcome—relationship quality—is undefined when a couple splits up. This article shows how treatment-control differences in mean outcomes can be misleading when outcomes are not defined for everyone and discusses ways to identify the seriousness of the problem. Potential solutions to the problem are described, including approaches that rely on simple treatment-control differences-in-means as well as more complex modeling approaches. |
URL | https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/the-truncationbydeath-problem-what-to-do-in-an-experimental-evaluation-when-the-outcome-is-not-always-defined |
来源智库 | Mathematica Policy Research (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/485924 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Sheena McConnell,Elizabeth A. Stuart,,Barbara Devaney. The Truncation-by-Death Problem: What to Do in an Experimental Evaluation When the Outcome Is Not Always Defined. 2008. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。