| 来源类型 | Publication |
| Evaluating Teachers: The Important Role of Value-Added | |
| Steven Glazerman; Susanna Loeb; Dan Goldhaber; Douglas Staiger; Stephen Raudenbush; and Grover Whitehurst | |
| 发表日期 | 2010-11-17 |
| 出版者 | Washington, DC: Brown Center on Education Policy at Brookings |
| 出版年 | 2010 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 概述 | This paper clarifies four areas of confusion about value-added methodology and its role in teacher evaluation: (1) use of value-added information; (2) consequences for teachers versus those for students of classifying and misclassifying teachers as effective or ineffective; (3) reliability of value-added measures of teacher performance and standards for evaluations in other fields; and (4) reliability of teacher evaluation systems that include value-added versus those that do not.", |
| 摘要 | This paper clarifies four areas of confusion about value-added methodology and its role in teacher evaluation: (1) use of value-added information; (2) consequences for teachers versus those for students of classifying and misclassifying teachers as effective or ineffective; (3) reliability of value-added measures of teacher performance and standards for evaluations in other fields; and (4) reliability of teacher evaluation systems that include value-added versus those that do not. |
| URL | https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/evaluating-teachers-the-important-role-of-valueadded |
| 来源智库 | Mathematica Policy Research (United States) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/486669 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Steven Glazerman,Susanna Loeb,Dan Goldhaber,et al. Evaluating Teachers: The Important Role of Value-Added. 2010. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
