| 来源类型 | Publication
|
| 来源ID | Working with Disability, Work, and Insurance in Brief #13
|
| What Were the Top Outcomes of State Medicaid Infrastructure (MIG) Grants? |
| Kristin Andrews
|
| 发表日期 | 2013-05-30
|
| 出版者 | Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research
|
| 出版年 | 2013
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 概述 | Authorized by the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act (the “Ticket Act”) of 1999 and administered by the Centers for Medicare \u0026 Medicaid Services (CMS), the Medicaid Infrastructure Grant (MIG) program afforded states the opportunity to develop infrastructures and initiatives that promoted, supported, and facilitated the competitive employment of people with disabilities.", |
| 摘要 | Authorized by the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act (the “Ticket Act”) of 1999 and administered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the Medicaid Infrastructure Grant (MIG) program afforded states the opportunity to develop infrastructures and initiatives that promoted, supported, and facilitated the competitive employment of people with disabilities. Specifically, the MIG program aimed to increase the number of people with disabilities participating in competitive employment by (1) developing Medicaid infrastructure by facilitating targeted improvements to a state’s Medicaid program and/or developing a comprehensive employment infrastructure that coordinates disparate state service delivery systems; (2) removing barriers to employment of persons with disabilities by creating systemic change throughout the Medicaid program and coordinating with other programs to further remove barriers; and (3) developing infrastructure that offers sustainable and significant improvement in the ability of the system to provide adequate health coverage, personal assistance, and other supports for people with disabilities who are competitively employed. For the most part, CMS mandated that MIG funding was not to be used for the direct provision of services, but rather to change the systems surrounding and supporting the employment of individuals with disabilities. The one exception was that states could use up to 10 percent of MIG funding to provide benefits counseling services. |
| URL | https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/what-were-the-top-outcomes-of-state-medicaid-infrastructure-mig-grants
|
| 来源智库 | Mathematica Policy Research (United States)
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/487411
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
Kristin Andrews. What Were the Top Outcomes of State Medicaid Infrastructure (MIG) Grants?. 2013.
|
|
文件名：
|
WWD_mig_grants.pdf
|
|
格式：
|
Adobe PDF
|
此文件暂不支持浏览
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
