Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Publication |
Horseshoes, Hand Grenades, and Treatment Effects? Reassessing Whether Nonexperimental Estimators are Biased | |
Kenneth Fortson; Philip Gleason; Emma Kopa; and Natalya Verbitsky-Savitz | |
发表日期 | 2015-02-28 |
出版者 | Economics of Education Review, vol. 44 |
出版年 | 2015 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard in estimating treatment effects. When an RCT is infeasible, regression modeling or statistical matching are often used instead.", |
摘要 | Highlights:
|
URL | https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/horseshoes-hand-grenades-and-treatment-effects-reassessing-whether-nonexperimental-estimators |
来源智库 | Mathematica Policy Research (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/488007 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Kenneth Fortson,Philip Gleason,Emma Kopa,et al. Horseshoes, Hand Grenades, and Treatment Effects? Reassessing Whether Nonexperimental Estimators are Biased. 2015. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。