G2TT
来源类型Publication
Evaluation of the Vocational Training Grant Fund in Namibia: Baseline Report
Evan Borkum; Arif Mamun; Linus Marco; and Malik Khan Mubeen
发表日期2015-08-28
出版者Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research
出版年2015
语种英语
概述Mathematica is conducting an impact evaluation of the Millennium Challenge Corporation funded Vocational Training Grant Fund (VTGF) in Namibia, which provided scholarships to Namibian youth to attend vocational training. The evaluation is examining the impacts of the VTGF on the training, employment, and income-related outcomes of trainees, using a random assignment design. This report presents our findings from a baseline survey conducted with the applicants who were randomly assigned.",
摘要

Key Findings:

  • The baseline treatment and control samples were very similar in demographic characteristics.
  • However, there were some large and statistically significant differences between the treatment and control groups in the baseline indicators most closely related to the follow-up outcomes, including training, employment, and earnings outcomes.
  • Because the baseline survey often was conducted several months after the start of VTGF training, the baseline indicators might have been affected by the training. Therefore, the treatment-control differences that we identified do not invalidate the design, and the baseline similarity in demographic characteristics gives us confidence that the design is valid. 

Mathematica is conducting an impact evaluation of the Vocational Training Grant Fund (VTGF) in Namibia, which was funded by Millennium Challenge Corporation and provided scholarships to Namibian youth to attend vocational training. To assess the validity of the random assignment design that we are using to estimate impacts, we examined baseline survey data collected from the applicants who were randomly assigned. These data suggest that the baseline treatment and control samples were very similar in demographic characteristics, increasing our confidence that there were no underlying differences between the two groups. In contrast, there were large and statistically significant differences in the baseline indicators most closely related to the follow-up outcomes. In particular, the treatment group was significantly more likely to have been enrolled in vocational training in the five years before the baseline survey, was significantly less likely to be employed at the time of the survey, and had significantly lower average earnings. However, these differences likely do not reflect underlying treatment-control differences that could threaten the validity of the design, but rather reflect a delay in the timing of the baseline survey relative to training. Specifically, because in most cases the survey was conducted several months after the start of VTGF training, many baseline indicators in the treatment group would have been affected by enrollment in VTGF training. Overall, the implications of the observed treatment-control differences are that the impact evaluation design still is likely to be valid.

URLhttps://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/evaluation-of-the-vocational-training-grant-fund-in-namibia-baseline-report
来源智库Mathematica Policy Research (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/488224
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Evan Borkum,Arif Mamun,Linus Marco,et al. Evaluation of the Vocational Training Grant Fund in Namibia: Baseline Report. 2015.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
vtgf_namibia_baselin(751KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Evan Borkum]的文章
[Arif Mamun]的文章
[Linus Marco]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Evan Borkum]的文章
[Arif Mamun]的文章
[Linus Marco]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Evan Borkum]的文章
[Arif Mamun]的文章
[Linus Marco]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: vtgf_namibia_baselinerpt.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。