G2TT
来源类型Publication
来源IDIn Focus Brief
In Focus: Examining States' Use of Policies and Practices Promoted by Race to the Top (In Focus Brief)
Lisa Dragoset; Susanne James-Burdumy; Kristin Hallgren; Irma Perez-Johnson; Mariesa Herrmann; Christina Tuttle; Megan Hague Angus; Rebecca Herman; Matthew Murray; Corutney Tanenbaum; and Cheryl Graczewski
发表日期2015-09-29
出版者Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research
出版年2015
语种英语
概述This brief summarizes findings from a new report from Mathematica’s multi-year evaluation of Race to the Top (RTT) for the Department of Education’s Institute of Education Sciences. It describes the policies and practices states reported using in spring 2012.",
摘要

Key Findings:

  • Early RTT states (which received Round 1 or Round 2 grants in 2010) reported using more RTT-promoted policies and practices than non-RTT states (which did not receive grants) in five of six areas: (1) building state data systems that measure student growth and inform instruction, (2) improving state capacity to support school improvement efforts, (3) encouraging conditions in which charter schools can succeed, (4) adopting standards and assessments that prepare students to succeed in college and the workplace, and (5) improving teacher and principal effectiveness. There were no differences between the two groups in the sixth area: turning around low-performing schools.
  • Later RTT states (which received Round 3 grants in 2011) reported using more RTT-promoted policies and practices than non-RTT states in one of the six areas: teacher and principal effectiveness.
  • Across all states, use of RTT-promoted policies and practices was highest in the state capacity and data systems areas and lowest in the teacher and principal effectiveness area.
  • Across the six areas, there were no differences between RTT and non-RTT states in use of RTT-promoted policies and practices that focused on English language learners (ELLs).
The brief describes the Race to the Top (RTT) policies and practices states reported using in spring 2012. The evaluation examines whether early RTT states (which received Round 1 or Round 2 grants in 2010) and later RTT states (which received Round 3 grants in 2011) were more likely to use the policies and practices promoted by RTT than non-RTT states (which did not receive grants).
URLhttps://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/examining-states-use-of-policies-and-practices-promoted-by-race-to-the-top
来源智库Mathematica Policy Research (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/488268
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Lisa Dragoset,Susanne James-Burdumy,Kristin Hallgren,et al. In Focus: Examining States' Use of Policies and Practices Promoted by Race to the Top (In Focus Brief). 2015.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
rtt_sig_states_ifbri(307KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Lisa Dragoset]的文章
[Susanne James-Burdumy]的文章
[Kristin Hallgren]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Lisa Dragoset]的文章
[Susanne James-Burdumy]的文章
[Kristin Hallgren]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Lisa Dragoset]的文章
[Susanne James-Burdumy]的文章
[Kristin Hallgren]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: rtt_sig_states_ifbrief.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。