G2TT
来源类型Publication
Lie for a Dime: When Most Prescreening Responses are Honest But Most "Eligible" Respondents are Lies
Jesse Chandler; Gabriele Paolacci
发表日期2016-11-22
出版者Social Psychological and Personality Science, (online ahead of print)
出版年2016
语种英语
概述The Internet has enabled recruitment of large samples with specific characteristics. However, when researchers rely on participant self-report to determine eligibility, data quality depends on participant honesty.",
摘要

The Internet has enabled recruitment of large samples with specific characteristics. However, when researchers rely on participant self-report to determine eligibility, data quality depends on participant honesty. Across four studies on Amazon Mechanical Turk, we show that a substantial number of participants misrepresent theoretically relevant characteristics (e.g., demographics, product ownership) to meet eligibility criteria explicit in the studies or inferred by exclusion from the study on a first attempt or in previous experiences with similar studies. When recruiting rare populations, a large proportion of responses can be deceptive. We conclude with recommendations about how to ensure that ineligible participants are excluded that are applicable to a wide variety of data collection efforts that rely on self-report.

URLhttps://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/lie-for-a-dime-when-most-prescreening-responses-are-honest-but-most-eligible-respondents-are-lies
来源智库Mathematica Policy Research (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/488691
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Jesse Chandler,Gabriele Paolacci. Lie for a Dime: When Most Prescreening Responses are Honest But Most "Eligible" Respondents are Lies. 2016.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Jesse Chandler]的文章
[Gabriele Paolacci]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Jesse Chandler]的文章
[Gabriele Paolacci]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Jesse Chandler]的文章
[Gabriele Paolacci]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。