Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Publication |
Lie for a Dime: When Most Prescreening Responses are Honest But Most "Eligible" Respondents are Lies | |
Jesse Chandler; Gabriele Paolacci | |
发表日期 | 2016-11-22 |
出版者 | Social Psychological and Personality Science, (online ahead of print) |
出版年 | 2016 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | The Internet has enabled recruitment of large samples with specific characteristics. However, when researchers rely on participant self-report to determine eligibility, data quality depends on participant honesty.", |
摘要 | The Internet has enabled recruitment of large samples with specific characteristics. However, when researchers rely on participant self-report to determine eligibility, data quality depends on participant honesty. Across four studies on Amazon Mechanical Turk, we show that a substantial number of participants misrepresent theoretically relevant characteristics (e.g., demographics, product ownership) to meet eligibility criteria explicit in the studies or inferred by exclusion from the study on a first attempt or in previous experiences with similar studies. When recruiting rare populations, a large proportion of responses can be deceptive. We conclude with recommendations about how to ensure that ineligible participants are excluded that are applicable to a wide variety of data collection efforts that rely on self-report. |
URL | https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/lie-for-a-dime-when-most-prescreening-responses-are-honest-but-most-eligible-respondents-are-lies |
来源智库 | Mathematica Policy Research (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/488691 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Jesse Chandler,Gabriele Paolacci. Lie for a Dime: When Most Prescreening Responses are Honest But Most "Eligible" Respondents are Lies. 2016. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。