Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Publication |
Optimizing Variance-Bias Trade-Off in the TWANG Package for Estimation of Propensity Scores | |
Layla Parast; Daniel F. McCaffrey; Lane F. Burgette; Fernando Hoces de la Guardia; Daniela Golinelli; Jeremy N. V. Miles; and Beth Ann Griffin | |
发表日期 | 2017-12-01 |
出版者 | Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, Vol. 17, issue 3-4 |
出版年 | 2017 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | While propensity score weighting has been shown to reduce bias in treatment effect estimation when selection bias is present, it has also been shown that such weighting can perform poorly if the estimated propensity score weights are highly variable.", |
摘要 | While propensity score weighting has been shown to reduce bias in treatment effect estimation when selection bias is present, it has also been shown that such weighting can perform poorly if the estimated propensity score weights are highly variable. Various approaches have been proposed which can reduce the variability of the weights and the risk of poor performance, particularly those based on machine learning methods. In this study, we closely examine approaches to fine-tune one machine learning technique [generalized boosted models (GBM)] to select propensity scores that seek to optimize the variance-bias trade-off that is inherent in most propensity score analyses. Specifically, we propose and evaluate three approaches for selecting the optimal number of trees for the GBM in the twang package in R. Normally, the twang package in R iteratively selects the optimal number of trees as that which maximizes balance between the treatment groups being considered. Because the selected number of trees may lead to highly variable propensity score weights, we examine alternative ways to tune the number of trees used in the estimation of propensity score weights such that we sacrifice some balance on the pre-treatment covariates in exchange for less variable weights. We use simulation studies to illustrate these methods and to describe the potential advantages and disadvantages of each method. We apply these methods to two case studies: one examining the effect of dog ownership on the owner’s general health using data from a large, population-based survey in California, and a second investigating the relationship between abstinence and a long-term economic outcome among a sample of high-risk youth. |
URL | https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/optimizing-variance-bias-trade-off-in-the-twang-package-for-estimation-of-propensity-scores |
来源智库 | Mathematica Policy Research (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/489086 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Layla Parast,Daniel F. McCaffrey,Lane F. Burgette,et al. Optimizing Variance-Bias Trade-Off in the TWANG Package for Estimation of Propensity Scores. 2017. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。