| 来源类型 | Publication
|
| 来源ID | OPRE Report #2018-63
|
| Causal Validity Considerations for Including High Quality Non-Experimental Evidence in Systematic Reviews |
| John Deke
|
| 发表日期 | 2018-06-30
|
| 出版者 | Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
|
| 出版年 | 2018
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 概述 | Federally funded systematic reviews of research evidence play a central role in efforts to base policy decisions on evidence.", |
| 摘要 | Federally funded systematic reviews of research evidence play a central role in efforts to base policy decisions on evidence. These evidence reviews seek to assist decision makers by rating the quality of and summarizing the findings from research evidence. Historically, evidence reviews have reserved the highest ratings of quality for studies that employ experimental designs, namely randomized control trials (RCTs). The RCT is considered the “gold standard” of research evidence because randomization ensures that the only thing that could cause a difference in outcomes between the treatment and control groups is the intervention program. However, not all intervention programs can be evaluated using an RCT. To develop an evidence base for those programs, non-experimental study designs may need to be used. |
| URL | https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/causal-validity-considerations-for-including-high-quality-non-experimental-evidence
|
| 来源智库 | Mathematica Policy Research (United States)
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/489291
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
John Deke. Causal Validity Considerations for Including High Quality Non-Experimental Evidence in Systematic Reviews. 2018.
|
|
文件名：
|
opre methods causal inference brief 2018 63.pdf
|
|
格式：
|
Adobe PDF
|
此文件暂不支持浏览
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
