G2TT
来源类型Publication
The Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative: Effects on Spending, Quality, Patients, and Physicians
Deborah Peikes; Stacy Dale; Arkadipta Ghosh; Erin Fries Taylor; Kaylyn Swankoski; Ann S. O'; Malley; Timothy J. Day; Nancy Duda; Pragya Singh; Grace Anglin; Laura L. Sessums; and Randall S. Brown
发表日期2018-06-30
出版者Health Affairs, vol. 37, no. 6
出版年2018
语种英语
概述This study evaluates the effect of the Comprehensive Primary Care (CPC) initiative on care delivery and outcomes for fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries over four years. CPC practices made improvements in care delivery, but did not reduce Medicare spending enough to cover care management fees.",
摘要

Key Findings:

  • CPC practices reported improved primary care delivery, such as care management for high-risk patients, enhanced access, and improved coordination after care transitions.
  • CPC slowed growth in emergency department visits by 2 percent relative to the comparison group. CPC also slowed growth in hospitalizations by 2 percent relative to the comparison group, though this finding was statistically significant only at the 10 percent level.
  • Similar to the earlier two-year results, Medicare expenditures grew more slowly for the CPC group than for the comparison group; however this change in Medicare expenditures was not enough to offset the initiative’s care management fees.
  • CPC did not appreciably improve or worsen physician or beneficiary experience or practice performance on a limited set of Medicare claims-based quality measures.

The Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative (CPC), a health care delivery model developed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), tested whether multipayer support of 502 primary care practices across the country would improve primary care delivery, improve care quality, or reduce spending. We evaluated the initiative’s effects on care delivery and outcomes for fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries attributed to initiative practices, relative to those attributed to matched comparison practices. CPC practices reported improvements in primary care delivery, including care management for high-risk patients, enhanced access, and improved coordination of care transitions. The initiative slowed growth in emergency department visits by 2 percent in CPC practices, relative to comparison practices. However, it did not reduce Medicare spending enough to cover care management fees or appreciably improve physician or beneficiary experience or practice performance on a limited set of Medicare claims-based quality measures. As CMS and other payers increasingly use alternative payment models that reward quality and value, CPC provides important lessons about supporting practices in transforming care.

URLhttps://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/ja-the-comprehensive-primary-care-initiative-effects-on-spending-quality-patients-and-physicians
来源智库Mathematica Policy Research (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/489299
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Deborah Peikes,Stacy Dale,Arkadipta Ghosh,et al. The Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative: Effects on Spending, Quality, Patients, and Physicians. 2018.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Deborah Peikes]的文章
[Stacy Dale]的文章
[Arkadipta Ghosh]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Deborah Peikes]的文章
[Stacy Dale]的文章
[Arkadipta Ghosh]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Deborah Peikes]的文章
[Stacy Dale]的文章
[Arkadipta Ghosh]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。