G2TT
来源类型Publication
来源IDT-MSIS Analytic Files Data Quality Brief #5162
The Volume of Encounter Claim Records from Comprehensive Managed Care Organizations in 2017 (Brief)
Julia Baller; Andres Arguello; Mary Allison Geibel; Brenda Natzke; Kimberly Proctor; and Jessie Parker
发表日期2019-10-24
出版者Baltimore, MD: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
出版年2019
语种英语
概述This analysis focused on the 35 states and the District of Columbia that had beneficiaries enrolled in comprehensive managed care programs in 2017. Mississippi, Missouri, and Nebraska, which had comprehensive managed care programs, were excluded from the analysis due to a low volume of claims.",
摘要

Key Findings:

  • States are required to report in T-MSIS encounter records that reflect services provided to Medicaid and CHIP beneficiaries by managed care organizations. These encounter records include one header and one or more associated line records per claim. Header records summarize information about the entire claim, and line records provide details about the individual goods and services billed as part of the claim. This brief examines the number of header- and line-level encounter records from comprehensive plans relative to the size of a state’s comprehensive managed care program. The analysis is conducted separately for the 2017 IP, LT, OT, and RX files. The purpose of this analysis is to identify states with completeness or quality problems in their managed care encounter data.
  • Of the 35 states and the District of Columbia that reported beneficiaries enrolled in comprehensive managed care programs in T-MSIS, 2 states fell into the low-concern category with respect to the volume of encounter records across all four claims files. Seven states fell into the low-concern category with respect to the volume of encounter records in the IP file, 6 states fell into this category with respect to the volume of encounter records in the OT file.
  • One states—North Dakota—did not have any encounter data in the T-MSIS Analytic Files; as a result, its claims data are unusable for research requiring encounter claims data. Iowa (IP and OT), South Carolina (LT), Tennessee (RX), and Wisconsin (RX) had no encounter data in one or more files, and therefore had unusable encounter claims data for some files.
URLhttps://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/the-volume-of-encounter-claim-records-from-comprehensive-managed-care-organizations-in-2017-brief
来源智库Mathematica Policy Research (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/489746
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Julia Baller,Andres Arguello,Mary Allison Geibel,et al. The Volume of Encounter Claim Records from Comprehensive Managed Care Organizations in 2017 (Brief). 2019.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
sud-databook-brief-5(513KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Julia Baller]的文章
[Andres Arguello]的文章
[Mary Allison Geibel]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Julia Baller]的文章
[Andres Arguello]的文章
[Mary Allison Geibel]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Julia Baller]的文章
[Andres Arguello]的文章
[Mary Allison Geibel]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: sud-databook-brief-5162.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。