来源类型 | Publication
|
来源ID | T-MSIS Analytic Files Data Quality Brief #5162
|
| The Volume of Encounter Claim Records from Comprehensive Managed Care Organizations in 2017 (Brief) |
| Julia Baller; Andres Arguello; Mary Allison Geibel; Brenda Natzke; Kimberly Proctor; and Jessie Parker
|
发表日期 | 2019-10-24
|
出版者 | Baltimore, MD: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
|
出版年 | 2019
|
语种 | 英语
|
概述 | This analysis focused on the 35 states and the District of Columbia that had beneficiaries enrolled in comprehensive managed care programs in 2017. Mississippi, Missouri, and Nebraska, which had comprehensive managed care programs, were excluded from the analysis due to a low volume of claims.", |
摘要 | Key Findings:
- States are required to report in T-MSIS encounter records that reflect services provided to Medicaid and CHIP beneficiaries by managed care organizations. These encounter records include one header and one or more associated line records per claim. Header records summarize information about the entire claim, and line records provide details about the individual goods and services billed as part of the claim. This brief examines the number of header- and line-level encounter records from comprehensive plans relative to the size of a state’s comprehensive managed care program. The analysis is conducted separately for the 2017 IP, LT, OT, and RX files. The purpose of this analysis is to identify states with completeness or quality problems in their managed care encounter data.
- Of the 35 states and the District of Columbia that reported beneficiaries enrolled in comprehensive managed care programs in T-MSIS, 2 states fell into the low-concern category with respect to the volume of encounter records across all four claims files. Seven states fell into the low-concern category with respect to the volume of encounter records in the IP file, 6 states fell into this category with respect to the volume of encounter records in the OT file.
- One states—North Dakota—did not have any encounter data in the T-MSIS Analytic Files; as a result, its claims data are unusable for research requiring encounter claims data. Iowa (IP and OT), South Carolina (LT), Tennessee (RX), and Wisconsin (RX) had no encounter data in one or more files, and therefore had unusable encounter claims data for some files.
|
URL | https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/the-volume-of-encounter-claim-records-from-comprehensive-managed-care-organizations-in-2017-brief
|
来源智库 | Mathematica Policy Research (United States)
|
资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/489746
|
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 |
Julia Baller,Andres Arguello,Mary Allison Geibel,et al. The Volume of Encounter Claim Records from Comprehensive Managed Care Organizations in 2017 (Brief). 2019.
|
文件名:
|
sud-databook-brief-5162.pdf
|
格式:
|
Adobe PDF
|
此文件暂不支持浏览
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。