G2TT
来源类型Publication
来源IDT-MSIS Analytic Files Data Quality Brief #4142
Missing Eligibility Group Codes in 2017 (Brief)
Su Liu; Risa Nakajima; Kimberly Proctor; and Jessie Parker
发表日期2019-10-24
出版者Baltimore, MD: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
出版年2019
语种英语
概述This analysis focused on 46 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Mississippi, Missouri, Montana and Nebraska were excluded from the analysis. Puerto Rico was excluded from the analysis of reporting of mandatory eligibility group codes because, by statute, it is allowed to exclude some mandatory groups.",
摘要

Key Findings:

  • Eligibility group codes allow T-MSIS Analytic File users to identify the basis on which an individual was deemed eligible for Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program. This brief identifies states in which (1) the eligibility group code had high rates of missing values in 2017, which suggests that the data were incomplete or (2) codes for certain large mandatory Medicaid eligibility groups were not used, which suggests that states may not be assigning the eligibility group code correctly.
  • Although the majority of states (38) had an eligibility group code assigned to more than 95 percent of their beneficiaries, only 13 states had at least one beneficiary in every mandatory eligibility group in which we would expect to see enrollment in all states. When we account for both beneficiaries who were missing an eligibility group code and the use of all expected mandatory eligibility group codes, 37 states fell into the medium or high concern category for the quality of the eligibility group code data.
  • When we examined patterns in the use of codes for the large mandatory eligibility groups, we found that all but one state (South Carolina) had enrollment in three groups: (1) parents and other caretaker relatives, (2) infants and children under age 19, and (3) qualified Medicare beneficiaries. We also found that all states except Idaho had enrollment in the pregnant women group. The mandatory eligibility groups in which states were least likely to have enrolled beneficiaries were the two disability groups—working disabled under 1619(b) and disabled adult children. Only 27 states and 32 states, respectively, had beneficiaries in these two groups.
URLhttps://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/missing-eligibility-group-codes-in-2017-brief
来源智库Mathematica Policy Research (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/489749
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Su Liu,Risa Nakajima,Kimberly Proctor,et al. Missing Eligibility Group Codes in 2017 (Brief). 2019.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
sud-databook-brief-4(1423KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Su Liu]的文章
[Risa Nakajima]的文章
[Kimberly Proctor]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Su Liu]的文章
[Risa Nakajima]的文章
[Kimberly Proctor]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Su Liu]的文章
[Risa Nakajima]的文章
[Kimberly Proctor]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: sud-databook-brief-4142.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。