Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Publication |
Who Knows if our Teachers are Prepared? Three Different Perspectives on Graduates' Instructional Readiness and the Features of Preservice Preparation that Predict them | |
Matthew Ronfeldt; Kavita Kapadia Matsko; Hillary Greene Nolan; Michelle Reininger | |
发表日期 | 2018 |
出版年 | 2018 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | This study follows 305 preservice teachers (PSTs) who student taught in Chicago Public Schools (CPS) in 2014-15 and were subsequently hired in CPS in 2015-16. Drawing on surveys of PSTs and their cooperating teachers (CTs) and CPS administrative data, we linked features of their preservice teacher education to three outcome measures for instructional readiness: (i) CTs’ perceptions of their PSTs’ preparedness to teach at the end of student teaching, (ii) PSTs’ self-perceptions of preparedness at the end of student teaching, as well as (iii) PSTs’ first-year observation ratings based on the district evaluation rubric. We first investigated whether these outcome measures were related to one another. We found that CTs’ perceptions of PSTs’ preparedness positively predict first-year observation ratings but PSTs’ self-perceived preparedness were unrelated. We then examined which features of preparation were positively related to these three outcomes and whether or not the same features predicted all three outcomes. PSTs received stronger first-year observation ratings when their CTs had stronger observation ratings themselves, their CTs reported providing stronger coaching in specific instructional areas, they gained employment in the same school in which they had completed their student teaching, and when their placements had been in self-contained elementary classrooms. However, these same features were generally unrelated to our two other survey-based outcome measures, while others emerged as important. This study then provides suggestive evidence that different features of preparation are likely promising levers for program improvement but that program leaders and policymakers must first consider which outcome might determine “improvement,” as different features appear to be associated with different measures of instructional readiness. |
主题 | Teaching and Leadership Effectiveness |
子主题 | Educator Preparation and Development ; Teacher Labor Markets ; Teacher Quality |
URL | https://cepa.stanford.edu/content/who-knows-if-our-teachers-are-prepared-three-different-perspectives-graduates-instructional-readiness-and-features-preservice-preparation-predict-them |
来源智库 | Center for Education Policy Analysis (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/491850 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Matthew Ronfeldt,Kavita Kapadia Matsko,Hillary Greene Nolan,et al. Who Knows if our Teachers are Prepared? Three Different Perspectives on Graduates' Instructional Readiness and the Features of Preservice Preparation that Predict them. 2018. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
wp18-01-v201801.pdf(392KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。