Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Project |
规范类型 | 研究项目 |
Protected areas and the poor - Time to re-evaluate evidence and strategies? | |
Turpie; Jane; McConnachie; Matthew | |
开始日期 | 2019-01-11 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | Long-standing arguments as to whether parks alleviate poverty or create poverty traps remain unresolved, as do the questions of whether development interventions to reduce human pressures on parks are |
摘要 | Long-standing arguments as to whether parks alleviate poverty or create poverty traps remain unresolved, as do the questions of whether development interventions to reduce human pressures on parks are effective in terms of human wellbeing or conservation outcomes. Our main research questions are:
This study will attempt to answer these questions using impact evaluation methods that are more robust than past approaches. The study will use South African parks as a case study, using spatial data augmented by data collected from parks authorities. The understanding generated by this study is expected to shift thinking about the nature and spatial location of the interventions required to achieve a win-win situation for both people and parks in rural landscapes. |
URL | https://efdinitiative.org/research/projects/protected-areas-and-poor-time-re-evaluate-evidence-and-strategies |
来源智库 | Environment for Development Initiative (Sweden) |
资源类型 | 智库项目 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/494118 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Turpie,Jane,McConnachie,et al. Protected areas and the poor - Time to re-evaluate evidence and strategies?. 2019. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Turpie]的文章 |
[Jane]的文章 |
[McConnachie]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Turpie]的文章 |
[Jane]的文章 |
[McConnachie]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Turpie]的文章 |
[Jane]的文章 |
[McConnachie]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。