G2TT
来源类型Research paper
规范类型论文
Proportionality in the Conduct of Hostilities: The Incidental Harm Side of the Assessment
Emanuela-Chiara Gillard
发表日期2018-12-10
出版年2018
语种英语
概述Clarification of international humanitarian law is important in ensuring compliance with the rule of proportionality, but a culture of compliance within armed forces and groups is also crucial.
摘要

Summary

  • Military operations are taking place with increasing frequency in densely populated areas. Such operations result in loss of life and harm to civilians, as well as damage to civilian objects, (including infrastructure providing essential services). In order to protect civilians, it is imperative that armed forces and groups comply with the rules of international humanitarian law on the conduct of hostilities, including the rule of proportionality.
  • The rule of proportionality prohibits attacks which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated. This research paper analyses the key steps that belligerents must take to give effect to the rule, with a particular focus on one side of proportionality assessments – the expected incidental harm.
  • Those undertaking proportionality assessments before or during an attack must consider whether the expected harm will be caused by the attack, and whether that harm could be expected (that is, was it reasonably foreseeable).
  • For the purpose of proportionality assessments, injury to civilians includes disease, and there is no reason in principle to exclude mental harm, even though it is currently challenging to identify and quantify it. Damage to civilian objects includes damage to elements of the natural environment.
  • Once the incidental harm to be considered has been identified, a value or weight must be assigned to it. This is then balanced against the value or weight of the military advantage anticipated from the attack to determine whether the harm would be excessive.
  • In the determination of whether the expected incidental harm would be excessive compared to the anticipated military advantage, ‘excessive’ is a wide but not indeterminate standard.
  • Belligerents should develop methodologies so that those planning and deciding attacks are provided with all necessary information on expected incidental harm, and to assist them in assigning weight to the incidental harm to be considered.
  • If it becomes apparent that the rule of proportionality will be contravened, the attack in question must be cancelled or suspended.
  • Clarification of the law is important in ensuring compliance with the rule of proportionality, but a culture of compliance within armed forces and groups, inculcated by their leaders, is also crucial.
主题Human Rights and Security
区域International Law
URLhttps://www.chathamhouse.org/publication/costs-fuelling-humanitarian-aid
来源智库Chatham House (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/49702
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Emanuela-Chiara Gillard. Proportionality in the Conduct of Hostilities: The Incidental Harm Side of the Assessment. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
2018-12-10-proportio(491KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Emanuela-Chiara Gillard]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Emanuela-Chiara Gillard]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Emanuela-Chiara Gillard]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: 2018-12-10-proportionality-conduct-hostilities-incidental-harm-gillard-final.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。