Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Article and other Publication |
规范类型 | 其他 |
DOI | 10.1057/ejdr.2015.84 |
Costs, benefits and the political economy of aid coordination: the case of the European Union | |
Klingebiel, Stephan; Mario Negre; Pedro Morazán | |
出版年 | 2017 |
摘要 | Although it is not possible to identify a specific, theoretical optimum level of aid coordination for the European Union, there is a broad consensus on the need for reduced transaction costs and greater impact through a stronger adherence to coordination standards. However, neither member states nor European institutions consequently follow a policy in line with a clear coordination principle. And nor do partner countries always push for more donor coordination. This article uses evidence from two country case studies, Myanmar and Rwanda, in which a conducive aid coordination environment is assumed. The former represents the new foundation of an aid architecture in a country, thus expecting the application of high aid effectiveness standards. The latter consists of a partner government with a strong leading role in aid. Although the political economy of donors and partner countries does not always favour coordination, strong recipient government leadership is crucial to align developmental objectives and clearly establish comparative advantages and division of labour among donors. |
URL | https://www.die-gdi.de/en/others-publications/article/costs-benefits-and-the-political-economy-of-aid-coordination-the-case-of-the-european-union/ |
来源智库 | German Development Institute (Germany) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/499192 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Klingebiel, Stephan,Mario Negre,Pedro Morazán. Costs, benefits and the political economy of aid coordination: the case of the European Union. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。