G2TT
来源类型Article and other Publication
规范类型其他
DOI10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.003
Why should ecosystem services be governed to support poverty alleviation? Philosophical perspectives on positions in the empirical literature
Lehmann, Ina; Adrian Martin; Janet A. Fisher
出版年2018
摘要In light of trade-offs related to the allocation of ecosystem services we investigate the prevalent norms that are drawn upon to justify why ecosystem governance should prioritise poverty alleviation. We are specifically concerned with poverty alleviation because we consider this an urgent problem of justice. We review empirical literature on social trade-offs in ecosystem services governance in order to identify the prevalent conceptions of justice that inform scholarly assessments of current practice. We find that empirical studies do present specific notions of justice as desirable benchmarks for ecosystem services governance but that they rarely attempt to spell out the precise meaning of these notions or what makes them desirable. For those notions of justice that we identify in this literature - sufficientarianism, egalitarianism and participatory approaches - we draw on philosophical justice literature in order to better articulate the normative arguments that could support them and to be more precise about the kind of actions and expectations that they invoke. Moreover, we point to some striking normative silences in the ecosystem services literature. We conclude that the ecosystem services justice discourse would benefit from more conceptual clarity and a broader examination of different aspects of justice.
URLhttps://www.die-gdi.de/en/others-publications/article/why-should-ecosystem-services-be-governed-to-support-poverty-alleviation-philosophical-perspectives-on-positions-in-the-empirical-literature/
来源智库German Development Institute (Germany)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/499214
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Lehmann, Ina,Adrian Martin,Janet A. Fisher. Why should ecosystem services be governed to support poverty alleviation? Philosophical perspectives on positions in the empirical literature.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Lehmann, Ina]的文章
[Adrian Martin]的文章
[Janet A. Fisher]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Lehmann, Ina]的文章
[Adrian Martin]的文章
[Janet A. Fisher]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Lehmann, Ina]的文章
[Adrian Martin]的文章
[Janet A. Fisher]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。