G2TT
来源类型Discussion Paper
规范类型工作论文
ISBN978-3-88985-683-8
Self-differentiation of countries’ responsibilities: addressing climate change through intended nationally determined contributions
Mbeva, Kennedy Liti; Pieter Pauw
发表日期2016
出版年2016
概述Do INDCs lead to self-differentiation of countries' responsibilities to address climate change? This paper shows that 1) INDCs advance CBDR-RC beyond mitigation to include, at least, adaptation and finance; 2) INDCs advance differentiation beyond the bifurcation of Annex I and non-Annex I countries.
摘要As a result of the United Nations (UN) climate negotiations in Warsaw in 2013, all countries were invited to submit a climate action plan – or “Intended Nationally Determined Contribution” (INDC) – as part of the preparations for the 2015 UN climate summit in Paris (COP21). The innovation of this instrument lies in the fact that it is universal (each country formulates one) and that they are formulated “bottom-up” (countries set their own priorities and ambitions). In theory, this stimulates countries’ self-differentiation of responsibilities and capabilities to address climate change.
This paper analyses 159 INDCs on whether they advanced self-differentiation in the context of the notion of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities (CBDR-RC). The analysis focuses on aspects beyond mitigation targets, including INDC sections on fairness / equity as well as INDC content on adaptation and climate finance.
Findings are provided for three country groupings:

  • 15 “Annex I” parties, representing 42 countries (the EU, as one Party, represents 28 countries);

  • 79 least-developed countries (LDCs) and small island developing states (SIDS), given the Paris Agreement’s subtle differentiation towards these country groups;
  • 65 “Middle countries” that fit neither category: a heterogeneous mixture of pre-dominantly middle-income countries.

This paper offers two main conclusions:
First, bottom-up setting of priorities and ambitions in INDCs advanced the issue of CBDR-RC beyond mitigation to include, at least, adaptation and finance. Although Annex I countries hardly mention adaptation in their INDCs, Middle countries, and LDCs and SIDS prioritise adaptation. The latter group, in particular, included adaptation plans and strategies. Climate finance was also hardly mentioned by Annex I countries. For Middle countries, however, and for LDCs and SIDS in particular, climate finance is often a condition for undertaking mitigation and adaptation.
Second, self-differentiation through INDCs advanced the evolution of differentiation beyond the bifurcation of Annex I and non-Annex I countries. For example, the three country groupings introduced above have cascading priorities and ambitions in adaptation and finance. Such differentiation already appears in the Paris Agreement through “subtle differentiation”: flexible differentiation that is applicable to specific subsets of countries (e.g. the LDCs and SIDS) on certain issues (e.g. adaptation and finance) and procedures (e.g. timelines and reporting).
The bottom-up formulation of INDCs brought many interesting insights about the climate politics and policies of years to come. However, as much as the instrument is universal, the limited guidance on the formulation of INDCs allowed for non-universal INDC content. For example, it is problematic that only the potential recipients included climate finance in their INDCs. Also, the adaptation challenge (e.g in terms of cost estimates and the global goal on adaptation that was decided upon in the Paris Agreement) remains unclear because developed countries did not include adaptation in their INDCs.

We have used our in-depth analysis of the INDCs to create an interactive visualization of countries’ policy priorities and ambitions. You can access the INDC Content Explorer via the Klimalog project page.

URLhttps://www.die-gdi.de/en/discussion-paper/article/self-differentiation-of-countries-responsibilities-addressing-climate-change-through-intended-nationally-determined-contributions/
来源智库German Development Institute (Germany)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/499954
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Mbeva, Kennedy Liti,Pieter Pauw. Self-differentiation of countries’ responsibilities: addressing climate change through intended nationally determined contributions. 2016.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
csm_DP_4.2016_d50a80(2KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
DP_4.2016.pdf(974KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Mbeva, Kennedy Liti]的文章
[Pieter Pauw]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Mbeva, Kennedy Liti]的文章
[Pieter Pauw]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Mbeva, Kennedy Liti]的文章
[Pieter Pauw]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: csm_DP_4.2016_d50a803be7_ab44f7037e.gif
格式: GIF
文件名: DP_4.2016.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。