G2TT
来源类型Discussion Paper
规范类型工作论文
ISBN978-3-96021-031-3
Accountability for development cooperation under the 2030 Agenda
Mahn Jones, Timo Casjen
发表日期2017
出版年2017
概述The contribution and accountability of development cooperation for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda are not clearly delineated. Going forward, this paper therefore proposes a fundamental rethink of the “mutual accountability” principle towards collective and interlinked accountability.
摘要What is the contribution of development cooperation to the 2030 Agenda, and how can accountability for that contribution be ensured? Implementing the 2030 Agenda will require a move from “Billions to Trillions”. However, the operationalization of commitments relies heavily on the traditional concept such as Official Development Assistance (ODA). In the future development cooperation will have to shift focus on leaving no one behind, providing seed funding and catalytic support, as well as leveraging additional resources. Strengthening the accountability of all contributions and maximizing their impact will be key, necessitating adjustments to principles and arrangements for (mutual) accountability.

Towards Collective Accountability

The operational value of “Mutual accountability” has been limited so far given power imbalances, unclear roles and objectives, lack of enforceability and overlapping accountability strands. Future collective Accountability will have to encompass not just public, but also private and civil society actors. Such collective accountability mechanisms can no longer enforce, but only incentivize action through peer-pressure, penalizing inertia through reputational damage, and encourage dialogue and reciprocal learning. Given the broad scope of the 2030 Agenda, achieving priorities and assigning responsibilities are clear obstacles. For development cooperation, the aid/development agenda may have continued value in that regard.

Interlinkages between existing accountability frameworks and the 2030 Agenda

In order for the United Nations High Level Political Forum (HLPF) to emerge as the locus of “global accountability”, the entry points, channels and feedback loops for the inputs from various stakeholders require further specification. Synergies and complementarities of existing accountability mechanisms for development cooperation need to be further exploited. Established frameworks such as the GPEDC, DCF and DAC lack stronger horizontal linkages to “global accountability” under the 2030 Agenda. There are also gaps in the vertical linkages between national, regional and global layers in both the development cooperation policy field, and for the 2030 Agenda. The principle of “subsidiarity” might be useful in organizing responsibilities. Development cooperation Stakeholders should better align their roles, activities and commitments with the 2030 accountability framework, including by sequencing meeting calendars, coordinating inputs, and aligning the timing and content of monitoring surveys.


URLhttps://www.die-gdi.de/en/discussion-paper/article/accountability-for-development-cooperation-under-the-2030-agenda/
来源智库German Development Institute (Germany)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/499978
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Mahn Jones, Timo Casjen. Accountability for development cooperation under the 2030 Agenda. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
csm_DP_10.2017_4b518(1KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
DP_10.2017.pdf(851KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Mahn Jones, Timo Casjen]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Mahn Jones, Timo Casjen]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Mahn Jones, Timo Casjen]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: csm_DP_10.2017_4b51864223_dceff325a3.gif
格式: GIF
文件名: DP_10.2017.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。