Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Briefing Papers |
规范类型 | 简报 |
What next for the Economic Partnership Agreements? Thoughts on deepening the EU-Africa trade partnership | |
Brandi, Clara; Merran Hulse; Niels Keijzer | |
发表日期 | 2017 |
出版年 | 2017 |
概述 | The fact that Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) are once more at the centre of discussion on European co-operation with Africa is to be welcomed. Against this background, we examine four scenarios for the future of the EPAs. |
摘要 | Many actors in the G20, the EU and Germany are calling for a quantum leap in the economic co-operation between Europe and Africa. However current discussion of EU-Africa trading relations frequently focuses solely on the much-debated Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs). EPA negotiations date back to the 2000 signing of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement (CPA) between the EU and the African, Caribbean and Pacific states (the ACP group). The ensuing negotiations took a highly controversial contentious turn, culminating during the 2007 EU-Africa Summit, when African heads of state and government accused the EU of looking to conclude trade agree¬ments between fundamentally asymmetrical markets. In light of the upcoming EU-Africa summit in November 2017, it is important to continue the dialogue regarding what the EU and Africa wish to achieve with the EPAs. EPAs could contribute to the strengthening co-operation between the EU and Africa by forming part of a broad strategy supported by adequate political, human and financial resources. EPAs however remain a divisive topic, with many actors having divergent expectations. Yet in spite of ongoing controversy regarding EPAs on both sides, there remains a strong common interest in intensifying trade co-operation between Africa and the EU. Against this background, this paper examines four possible scenarios for the future of the EPAs– with their respective opportunities and risks:
The discussion of these scenarios shows that EPAs offer key benefits to EU-Africa trading relations, for example by strengthening legal security for the parties involved (Scenario A). The discontinuation of negotiations (Scenario B) offers no solution for the future of EU-Africa relations, with a restart of these (Scenario C) also offering little prospect of success. We therefore urge the adoption of a modified and more flexible EPA agenda (Scenario D), which specifically addresses the concerns of the ACP countries, reinforces African regional integration processes, and delivers more supportive measures than a continuation of the current strategy. |
URL | https://www.die-gdi.de/en/briefing-paper/article/what-next-for-the-economic-partnership-agreements-thoughts-on-deepening-the-eu-africa-trade-partnership/ |
来源智库 | German Development Institute (Germany) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/502278 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Brandi, Clara,Merran Hulse,Niels Keijzer. What next for the Economic Partnership Agreements? Thoughts on deepening the EU-Africa trade partnership. 2017. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
csm_BP_9.2017_7634f5(4KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | ![]() 浏览 | ||
BP_9.2017.pdf(1255KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。