G2TT
来源类型Briefing Papers
规范类型简报
DOI10.23661/bp3.2019
What do we know about post-conflict transitional justice from academic research: key insights for practitioners
Fiedler, Charlotte; Karina Mross
发表日期2019
出版年2019
概述Can transitional justice (TJ) strengthen peace in post-conflict contexts? This Briefing Paper summarises the policy-relevant insights of systematic analyses of TJ instruments that have emerged in the last years. They suggest that TJ can contribute to peace, but some instruments more so than others.
摘要Societies that have experienced violent conflict face considerable challenges in building sustainable peace. One crucial question they need to address is how to deal with their violent past and atrocities that were committed – for example, whether perpetrators should be held accountable by judicial means, or whether the focus should be laid on truth telling and the compensation of victims. Transitional justice (TJ) offers a range of instruments that aim to help societies come to terms with their history of violent conflict. Systematic, empirical analyses of TJ instruments have been emerging over the last years. This Briefing Paper summarises the policy-relevant insights they provide regarding the main TJ instruments: trials; truth commissions; reparations for victims; and amnesties. Reviewing academic literature on the effects of transitional justice in post-conflict contexts, three main messages emerge:

  • Initial evidence suggests that transitional justice can help to foster peace. Contrary to concerns that actively dealing with the past may deepen societal divisions and cause renewed conflict, most statistical studies find either positive effects or no effects of the various instruments on peace.

  • Research indicates that amnesties can help to build peace, though not as a response to severe war crimes. Contrary to strong reservations against amnesties at the international level (especially on normative grounds), several academic studies find that amnesties can statistically significantly reduce the risk of conflict recurrence. However, the most extensive and recent study also shows that this effect varies depending on the context: amnesties can contribute to peace when they are included in peace agreements, but have no effect after episodes of very severe violence.
  • To effectively foster peace, trials should target all perpetrators involved in the conflict, not only the defeated party. A likely explanation for this finding from a recent study is that otherwise domestic trials can be used by the victorious party to punish and repress the defeated side. More generally, donors should be aware that if a political regime is able to instrumentalise a transitional justice process, for instance after a one-sided victory or in an undemocratic environment, the process is often not conducive to peace.

Reviewing the literature also makes clear that important, open questions remain:

  • Can transitional justice contribute to a deeper quality of peace that goes beyond the absence of violence? TJ should be able to foster reconciliation and mend broken societal relationships. However, if and how TJ can affect social cohesion after conflict needs to be better understood.

  • How do various transitional justice instruments need to be combined? Both the academic literature and policy documents suggest that it is important to find the right mix of instruments, but more systematic analyses of successful combinations of TJ instruments are necessary.
  • What role does donor support play in processes of transitional justice? Although transitional justice can be strongly domestically driven, such as in Colombia, donor funding often facilitates these processes. However, we still know too little about the effectiveness of such support.

URLhttps://www.die-gdi.de/en/briefing-paper/article/what-do-we-know-about-post-conflict-transitional-justice-from-academic-research-key-insights-for-practitioners/
来源智库German Development Institute (Germany)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/502327
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Fiedler, Charlotte,Karina Mross. What do we know about post-conflict transitional justice from academic research: key insights for practitioners. 2019.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
csm_BP__3.2019_2d9aa(4KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
BP__3.2019.pdf(1351KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Fiedler, Charlotte]的文章
[Karina Mross]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Fiedler, Charlotte]的文章
[Karina Mross]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Fiedler, Charlotte]的文章
[Karina Mross]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: csm_BP__3.2019_2d9aa834b0_00bd071efa.gif
格式: GIF
文件名: BP__3.2019.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。