Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Faculty Working Papers |
规范类型 | 工作论文 |
来源ID | CID Faculty Working Paper No. 359 |
Putting Global Governance in its Place | |
Dani Rodrik | |
发表日期 | 2019-08 |
出版年 | 2019 |
摘要 | In a world economy that is highly integrated, most policies produce effects across the border. This is often believed to be an argument for greater global governance, but the logic requires scrutiny. There remains strong revealed demand for policy and institutional diversity among nations, rooted in differences in historical, cultural, or development trajectories. The canonical case for global governance is based on two set of circumstances. The first occurs when there is global public good (GPG) and the second under “beggar-thy-neighbor” (BTN) policies. However, the world economy is not a global commons, and virtually no economic policy has the nature of a global public good (or bad). And while there are some important BTN policies, much of our current discussions deal with policies that are not true BTNs. The policy failures that exist arise not from weaknesses of global governance, but from distortions of domestic governance. As a general rule, these domestic failures cannot be fixed through international agreements or multilateral cooperation. The paper closes by discussing an alternative model of global governance called “democracy-enhancing global governance.” |
关键词 | Global Governance Trade Wars |
URL | https://www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/cid/publications/faculty-working-papers/global-governance |
来源智库 | Center for International Development (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/503278 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Dani Rodrik. Putting Global Governance in its Place. 2019. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Dani Rodrik]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Dani Rodrik]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Dani Rodrik]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。