Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working and discussion papers |
规范类型 | 工作论文 |
Dominica: Natural Disasters and Economic Development in a Small Island State | |
Charlotte Benson; Edward Clay with Franklyn V. Michael and Alastair W. Robertson | |
发表日期 | 2001 |
出版年 | 2001 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | The wider economic and financial impacts of natural disasters in Dominica, the factors determining the vulnerability of hazard-prone economies and opportunities for mitigation. |
摘要 | This country study of Dominica is the first of three studies undertaken as part of a broader research project aimed at increasing understanding of: Many of the study findings are intuitive, even obvious. However, this is the first time that the evidence has been brought together, systematically analyzed and policy implications drawn. Dominica’s economy is, with perhaps the exception of offshore financial services, highly vulnerable to tropical storms. Hurricane David in 1979 had the most catastrophic effects in modern times on the environment, economy and society, but there were severe storms too in 1989, 1995 and 1999. The study draws a number of key conclusions: 2. Dynamic nature of vulnerability - the Dominica economy’s vulnerability is constantly changing, reflecting both the longer-term direction of development and capital formation in the island, and also shorter-term shifts in the structure and composition of economic activity. For example, the fall in banana production during the 1990s has (positively) reduced the potential scale of agricultural losses in a disaster. However, a more diversified agricultural sector will be less secure because crop insurance is only available for bananas, which also had an assured export market. As a further example, the scale of physical damage to the transport network is now potentially far greater and the pace of recovery could be slower due to the long-term development of a largely coastal road system without adequate sea defenses. 3. Economic policy choices in disaster management - in the immediate aftermath of a disaster, both government and the private sector face choices between the pursuit of rapid recovery and a reduction in longer-term hazard vulnerability. In Dominica, effectively by default, the emphasis has been on quick recovery because the political impetus and associated financial incentives for investing in mitigation and changes in land use have been insufficiently strong. The study also highlights the tensions caused by the wide range of demands on public finance, including forfunding to reduce physical vulnerability to natural hazards. Such tensions are particularly acute in this smallisland economy, with relatively high per capita infrastructure needs, in turn due to diseconomies of small scale and a relatively scattered population combined with a difficult and mountainous terrain. The study points to the need for improved information on the budgetary impact of disasters both to facilitate costeffective allocation of resources and also to emphasize the importance of integrating hazard risk reduction into medium - and long-term economic and financial planning. 4. Natural hazard information and risk management – the levels and forms of hazard risk information available in Dominica have been unsatisfactory, hindering appropriate risk-averting decision making. Issues that urgently need to be addressed include ensuring sufficient investment in monitoring, assessment, mapping and dissemination activities. Public information needs to be provided in an easily understood and usable form. Achieving and sustaining such investment is particularly difficult in a small island economy, because there are economies of scale and hazard information is a regional public good. 5. Wider implications for small island states - the vulnerability of a small economy can alter quickly. The sources of change are structural, occurring within an open economy that is being driven now by exogenous forcing mechanisms – technological development, globalisation and climatic change. In considering appropriate forms of disaster mitigation, it is important to recognize the physical characteristics of the island(s) which underlie the economy and society. This study reconfirms the substantial value added in disaster mitigation investment in key infrastructure. The encouragement of less vulnerable areas of activity will facilitate long-term sustainable development by buffering medium-term growth from the effects of disaster shocks. The role of catastrophe insurance and other financial risk-spreading mechanisms in spreading and reducing risk also needs to be enhanced significantly in the Caribbean and increased use should be made of such mechanisms as a tool for promoting hazard mitigation. Donors need to address their own problems of coherence and overstretch in working with small island states by adopting joint programs, agreeing lead agencies on projects, supporting regional solutions and reducing micromanagement of projects. |
主题 | economic development ; public finance ; forests ; environment ; Central America and the Caribbean ; Dominica |
URL | https://www.odi.org/publications/3656-dominica-natural-disasters-and-economic-development-small-island-state |
来源智库 | Overseas Development Institute (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/505351 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Charlotte Benson,Edward Clay with Franklyn V. Michael and Alastair W. Robertson. Dominica: Natural Disasters and Economic Development in a Small Island State. 2001. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
4792.pdf(2225KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。