Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Research reports and studies |
规范类型 | 报告 |
Reconciling Alignment and Performance in Budget Support Programmes: What Next? | |
David Booth; Karin Christiansen; Paolo de Renzio | |
发表日期 | 2005 |
出版年 | 2005 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | This paper reviews the current state of the debate about policy alignment and performance assessment. |
摘要 | This paper reviews the current state of the debate about policy alignment and performance assessment, focusing particularly on the troublesome relationship between budget-support Performance Assessment Frameworks and PRS annual progress reviews. It argues that further advances in alignment will be achieved only if more explicit attention is given to the recipient side of the relationship and the reasons why Annual Progress Reports do not have the qualities donors expect. Until this is done, there is a case for simplifying PAFs but not for making them more results-based. PAFs should build country ownership by including only the sorts of conditionalities that are likely to work, and combining these with a multi-level selectivity and complementary actions to address missing preconditions for aid effectiveness. |
主题 | aid ; public finance |
URL | https://www.odi.org/publications/1455-reconciling-alignment-and-performance-budget-support-programmes-what-next |
来源智库 | Overseas Development Institute (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/506173 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | David Booth,Karin Christiansen,Paolo de Renzio. Reconciling Alignment and Performance in Budget Support Programmes: What Next?. 2005. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。