Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Books or book chapters |
规范类型 | 图书 |
‘Did Conditionality Streamlining Succeed?’ in Koeberle, S. et al. ‘Conditionality Revisited: Concepts, Experiences and Lessons’ | |
Tony Killick | |
发表日期 | 2005 |
出版年 | 2005 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | This chapter looks at the evolving use and understanding of 'conditionality'. |
摘要 | This chapter looks at the evolving use and understanding of 'conditionality'. There have been deep divisions over the understanding of this term, between those who have seen it as 'an instrument of mutual accountability' and those who viewed it as a tool of financial leverage, forcing governments to do what they would otherwise not have done. In recent years, however, many of these divisions have narrowed as both governments and International Financial Institutions have gravitated towards a more agreeable middle-ground. This paper asks what has changed and whether this streamlining has succeeded. |
主题 | aid ; global governance ; europe ; global institutions |
URL | https://www.odi.org/publications/1408-did-conditionality-streamlining-succeed-koeberle-s-et-al-conditionality-revisited-concepts |
来源智库 | Overseas Development Institute (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/506321 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Tony Killick. ‘Did Conditionality Streamlining Succeed?’ in Koeberle, S. et al. ‘Conditionality Revisited: Concepts, Experiences and Lessons’. 2005. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Tony Killick]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Tony Killick]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Tony Killick]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。