G2TT
来源类型Working and discussion papers
规范类型工作论文
Developmental patrimonialism? Questioning the orthodoxy on political governance and economic progress in Africa
Tim Kelsall and David Booth; with Diana Cammack and Frederick Golooba-Mutebi
发表日期2010
出版年2010
语种英语
概述Sets out elements of a typological theory of regimes and development performance, based on degree of rent centralisation and length of time horizon.
摘要

The relationship between neo-patrimonialism and development seems more complex than is allowed for in either orthodox policy advice on ‘good governance’ or the standard political science accounts. This paper explores the range of historical and current experience among African political regimes, with particular reference to seven countries of Middle Africa. Drawing inspiration from literature on Asia, it proposes a way of getting to grips analytically with the diversity of African experience by setting out some elements of a typological theory about regimes and development performance. This centres on two aspects of the way rents are managed under different regimes: the degree of centralisation and the length of the time-horizon. The strengths and limitations of the particular type termed ‘developmental patrimonialism’ are discussed in relation to various periods in the history of Côte d’Ivoire, Malawi, Kenya, Rwanda and Tanzania. Issues for further research are identified.

主题governance ; sub-Saharan Africa
URLhttps://www.odi.org/publications/16497-developmental-patrimonialism-questioning-orthodoxy-political-governance-and-economic-progress-africa
来源智库Overseas Development Institute (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/507772
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Tim Kelsall and David Booth,with Diana Cammack and Frederick Golooba-Mutebi. Developmental patrimonialism? Questioning the orthodoxy on political governance and economic progress in Africa. 2010.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
appp-wp9-development(331KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Tim Kelsall and David Booth]的文章
[with Diana Cammack and Frederick Golooba-Mutebi]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Tim Kelsall and David Booth]的文章
[with Diana Cammack and Frederick Golooba-Mutebi]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Tim Kelsall and David Booth]的文章
[with Diana Cammack and Frederick Golooba-Mutebi]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: appp-wp9-developmental-patrimonialism-questioning-the_orthodoxy-tim-kelsall-david-booth-july-2010.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。