Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working and discussion papers |
规范类型 | 工作论文 |
Eradicating global poverty: a noble goal, but how do we measure it? | |
Emma Samman; Martin Ravallion; Lant Pritchett; Stephan Klasen; Sabina Alkire; Amanda Lenhardt; Emmanuel Letouzé | |
发表日期 | 2013 |
出版年 | 2013 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | This working paper collates proposals from several experts on how to measure poverty in a post-2015 agreement. Their contributions show some consensus, but also several areas of contention. |
摘要 | The first Millennium Development Goal sought to ‘eradicate extreme poverty and hunger’, and its first target was to halve extreme poverty in 25 years. Progress notwithstanding – the target was met some five years ahead of schedule – some 1 in 5 people today cannot provide for their most basic needs. Amid a great deal of debate over what a post-2015 framework should encompass, there is widespread support for a continued poverty focus. The High-Level Panel’s report recommends that, ‘eradicating extreme poverty from the face of the earth by 2030’ should lie at the core of a new agreement: ‘This is something that leaders have promised time and time again throughout history. Today it can actually be done.’ The World Bank has endorsed this view, as have David Cameron, Barack Obama, and others. This proposal rests upon a very specific understanding of extreme poverty. But is the goal ambitious enough – in terms of who it targets, and how? It is not clear that the $1.25 a day poverty line, the measure upon which this vision of a poverty-free world rests, is the best way to think about and to measure poverty, or that it is sufficient. To address these issues, we asked several experts to make proposals as to how to measure poverty in a post-2015 agreement. Their contributions show some consensus, but also several areas of contention. There are arguments that poverty is relative as well as absolute, and over whether apt reference points are the societies in which people live or global societies. Some advocate higher international income poverty lines, arguing that they hold greater meaning in rich and poor countries alike. Others have argued that purchasing power parity adjustments may not reflect the incomes of the poor well and that national poverty lines would offer a better solution. Others have taken issue with an income-based poverty metric, arguing that poverty should be measured in a multidimensional, or disaggregated fashion, since not all experience poverty equally. These proposals originally appeared as a series of blogs on ODI's Development Progress website. |
主题 | millennium development goals ; inequality ; data ; social exclusion ; poverty ; monitoring, evaluation and learning |
URL | https://www.odi.org/publications/7534-eradicating-global-poverty-noble-goal-how-do-we-measure-it |
来源智库 | Overseas Development Institute (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/508437 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Emma Samman,Martin Ravallion,Lant Pritchett,et al. Eradicating global poverty: a noble goal, but how do we measure it?. 2013. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
8440.pdf(1711KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。