Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Research reports and studies |
规范类型 | 报告 |
Fragility, conflict and violence as global public goods: strengthening engagement by multilateral development banks | |
Alastair McKechnie | |
发表日期 | 2016 |
出版年 | 2016 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | This paper examines the comparative advantage of multilateral development banks in addressing issues of fragility, conflict and violence. |
摘要 | This report demonstrates that fragility, conflict and violence fit the classic definition of regional and global public goods, albeit negative public goods or public ‘bads’. Having established this definition, the report examines the comparative advantage of multilateral development banks which enable them to avoid many of the pitfalls encountered by other aid modalities. Such advantages include: the avoidance of fragmented, small-scale projects; insulation from the political pressures that can cause volatility in aid flows; long-term country engagement, enabling them to support the institutional development that characterises the transition from fragility to resilience; and the use of country systems that strengthen local capacity. |
主题 | global institutions |
URL | https://www.odi.org/publications/10568-fragility-conflict-and-violence-global-public-goods-strengthening-engagement-multilateral |
来源智库 | Overseas Development Institute (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/509423 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Alastair McKechnie. Fragility, conflict and violence as global public goods: strengthening engagement by multilateral development banks. 2016. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
10900.pdf(793KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Alastair McKechnie]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Alastair McKechnie]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Alastair McKechnie]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。