Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working and discussion papers |
规范类型 | 工作论文 |
Refining advocacy assessment: reflections from practice | |
Anne Buffardi; Simon Hearn and Helen Tilley | |
发表日期 | 2017 |
出版年 | 2017 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | This working paper revisits advocacy evaluation frameworks from the past decade, discussing problems, implications for practice and suggestions for future work. |
摘要 | Efforts to assess advocacy – and thinking about how best to do so – are relatively recent compared to other fields. However, in the past decade a number of advocacy evaluation frameworks have emerged. This working paper looks at how these existing frameworks classify people and activities, and define and assess outcomes. It identifies problem areas, discusses implications for practice, and offers suggestions on how they can be addressed. The paper is derived from work over the past five years, revisiting recommendations from existing guidance, many of which the authors have followed and suggested to others. The working paper aims to contribute to further adaption and refinement of conceptual thinking and practical tools to assess advocacy. |
主题 | adaptive development ; evidence and policy ; monitoring, evaluation and learning ; Global |
URL | https://www.odi.org/publications/10731-refining-advocacy-assessment-reflections-practice |
来源智库 | Overseas Development Institute (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/509773 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Anne Buffardi,Simon Hearn and Helen Tilley. Refining advocacy assessment: reflections from practice. 2017. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
11335.pdf(560KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。