G2TT
来源类型Working and discussion papers
规范类型工作论文
Refining advocacy assessment: reflections from practice
Anne Buffardi; Simon Hearn and Helen Tilley
发表日期2017
出版年2017
语种英语
概述This working paper revisits advocacy evaluation frameworks from the past decade, discussing problems, implications for practice and suggestions for future work.
摘要

Efforts to assess advocacy – and thinking about how best to do so – are relatively recent compared to other fields. However, in the past decade a number of advocacy evaluation frameworks have emerged. This working paper looks at how these existing frameworks classify people and activities, and define and assess outcomes. It identifies problem areas, discusses implications for practice, and offers suggestions on how they can be addressed.

The paper is derived from work over the past five years, revisiting recommendations from existing guidance, many of which the authors have followed and suggested to others. The working paper aims to contribute to further adaption and refinement of conceptual thinking and practical tools to assess advocacy.

主题adaptive development ; evidence and policy ; monitoring, evaluation and learning ; Global
URLhttps://www.odi.org/publications/10731-refining-advocacy-assessment-reflections-practice
来源智库Overseas Development Institute (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/509773
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Anne Buffardi,Simon Hearn and Helen Tilley. Refining advocacy assessment: reflections from practice. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
11335.pdf(560KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Anne Buffardi]的文章
[Simon Hearn and Helen Tilley]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Anne Buffardi]的文章
[Simon Hearn and Helen Tilley]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Anne Buffardi]的文章
[Simon Hearn and Helen Tilley]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: 11335.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。