Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Expert Comment |
规范类型 | 评论 |
Afghanistan | |
David Livingstone MBE DSC | |
发表日期 | 2009-08-28 |
出版年 | 2009 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Afghanistan is in a fully developed condition of insurgency, with Taleban influence reaching many parts of the country and seeping into all levels of society. This being the case why is the focus consistently on the military campaign? This tendency calls into question whether there is sufficient comprehension, both by Government and by the media, about how Afghanistan will become a free, independent and united country which is politically and economically stable and viable. The United Kingdom is not a newcomer to fighting counter-insurgency. From Malaya in the late 1940s, through Cyprus, Kenya and Northern Ireland and now to the present day in Afghanistan, counter-insurgency doctrine has been developed, tested and refined. The former British military officer and counter-insurgency expert, Sir Robert Thompson, laid out a number of principles for defeating counter-insurgency, all of which survive and remain central to any counter-insurgency strategy. Thompson stated that the national government (in our case Afghanistan) must:
When the UK's Defence Secretary stated that 'Afghanistan is winnable', by logical extension he is suggesting that the campaign is also loseable. Military force alone cannot deliver a peaceful Afghanistan. To focus too much on battles and skirmishes misses out entirely the most important part of the campaign - civil action. The elections are an important aspect of that civil strategy. The result of the ballot is less important than the signal that an election process sends to the Afghan people, in that there is a programme of social justice and infrastructure development in progress. To be even more effective, the Afghan people must also be persuaded that the votes they cast are valid; that the voting system is a means to an end (of self-determination) in which their individual interests are represented, without fear or favour, at local, regional and national level. Military operations have been valid in creating the best conditions possible for this election, but in the end only support a grander plan in which civil action, being led by civil agencies, is the main effort. |
主题 | Peacekeeping and Intervention ; Democracy |
区域 | Afghanistan |
URL | https://www.chathamhouse.org/media/comment/view/163549 |
来源智库 | Chatham House (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/51157 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | David Livingstone MBE DSC. Afghanistan. 2009. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[David Livingstone MBE DSC]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[David Livingstone MBE DSC]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[David Livingstone MBE DSC]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。