G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
来源IDRR-124/1-AF
Assessment of Beddown Alternatives for the F-35: Executive Summary
Ronald G. McGarvey; James H. Bigelow; Gary J. Briggs; Peter Buryk; Raymond E. Conley; John G. Drew; Perry Shameem Firoz; Julie Kim; Lance Menthe; Craig Moore; et al.
发表日期2013-04-03
出版年2013
语种英语
结论

All 28 Alternatives Considered Satisfy Surge Requirements

  • All beddown alternatives were found to have sufficient squadrons to satisfy surge squadron requirements.
  • Further, most alternatives satisfy rotational requirements within specified deploy-to-dwell ratios.

Achieving Pilot Absorption Conditions Will Require Change and Additional Resources

  • Squadron size and active-reserve mix affected experience levels in reserve units.
  • Squadron size effects could have a significant impact on pilot absorption flying costs.

Savings Are Attainable in Manpower and Support

  • Increasing squadron size reduces maintenance manpower requirements.
  • Squadron size has a significant impact on total support equipment procurement costs.
  • Utilizing current F-16 and A-10 bases, little additional capacity would be required under the 28 basing alternatives considered.

Assignment Policy Affects Leader Development More Than Squadron Size or Active-Reserve Mix

  • F-35 basing alternatives would have a slight effect on the AC's capacity for producing future senior leaders with targeted combinations of experience.
  • There will be some constraints with respect to fighter pilot leadership development, aside from the impacts of squadron size in terms of developing preferred characteristics.
  • The Air Force would still be able to produce at least as many well-qualified candidates than have actually been promoted to general officer during recent years.
摘要

As currently planned, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is the most costly aircraft acquisition program in Defense Department history. One approach to ensuring program affordability could be to increase the number of Primary Aerospace Vehicles Authorized (PAA) per combat-coded squadron, with a resulting reduction in the number of F-35 combat-coded squadrons. RAND explored the impact of increasing the PAA per squadron, adjusting the mix of PAA across the Active and Reserve Components, and adjusting the percentage of the Active Component PAA assigned to home-station locations in the continental United States.

,

Researchers considered 28 beddown alternatives, with a maximum of 36 PAA per squadron, and determined that all beddowns could satisfy surge deployment requirements and most could also satisfy rotational requirements within specified deploy-to-dwell ratios. Increasing squadron size was determined to significantly reduce (a) the flying costs necessary to achieve pilot absorption requirements, (b) maintenance manpower requirements, and (c) total support equipment procurement costs, while little additional infrastructure capacity would be required under any of the 28 basing alternatives considered. Additional analysis suggested that assignment policy would have more effect on leader development than either squadron size or the active-reserve mix.

目录 Assessment of Beddown Alternatives for the F-35: Executive Summary | RAND
主题Fighter Aircraft ; Military Budgets and Defense Spending ; Military Logistics ; United States Air Force
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR124z1.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/522262
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Ronald G. McGarvey,James H. Bigelow,Gary J. Briggs,et al. Assessment of Beddown Alternatives for the F-35: Executive Summary. 2013.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR124z1.pdf(810KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1367418879262.gif(4KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Ronald G. McGarvey]的文章
[James H. Bigelow]的文章
[Gary J. Briggs]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Ronald G. McGarvey]的文章
[James H. Bigelow]的文章
[Gary J. Briggs]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Ronald G. McGarvey]的文章
[James H. Bigelow]的文章
[Gary J. Briggs]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR124z1.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1367418879262.gif
格式: GIF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。