G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
来源IDRR-172-A
Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills for Army Leaders Using Blended-Learning Methods
Susan G. Straus; Michael G. Shanley; Maria C. Lytell; James C. Crowley; Sarah H. Bana; Megan Clifford; Kristin J. Leuschner
发表日期2013-07-17
出版年2013
语种英语
结论

Students Were Generally Satisfied with the Course

  • The majority of students felt that AOC-BDL achieved its core purpose. Most were satisfied with computer-based instruction, instruction of operational topics, and aspects of the learning environment, such as instruction quality and peer interaction and feedback.

Students Noted that the Distributed Environment Posed Challenges to Meeting Course Goals

  • Students reported that computer-supported collaborative learning impeded some course goals, particularly for complex topics, such as the military decision making process. Students also cited challenges to group coordination due to technology reliability and access, competing commitments, and difficulties working across time zones.

Although Many Blended-Learning Courses Have a Face-to-Face Component, In-Person Instruction May Not Be Possible in all Situations

  • Adding a resident segment to AOC-BDL may offer the greatest potential for improvement and is consistent with student preferences and best practices. However, this option may not be feasible due to available infrastructure, costs, and operational manning requirements. Consequently, other strategies become particularly important to consider.

Cases Studies of BDL and Related Research Point to Best Practices and Options for Improvement

  • Successful BDL programs find ways to reduce conflicts with students' other commitments. Two strategies include limiting the use of synchronous modalities and engaging students' employers to dedicate time for students' coursework. Instructors use a variety of approaches to engage students and foster success in virtual collaboration, including training students in use of course technology, scaffolding discussions, providing timely feedback, limiting group size for interactive activities, and using peer evaluations to increase accountability in teams.
摘要

The U.S. Army's Command and General Staff School offers its Advanced Operations Course (AOC) for junior field-grade officers using both traditional resident instruction and a model referred to as blended distributed learning (BDL). The BDL course lasts 12 months and uses a variety of information and communication technologies to support synchronous and asynchronous collaboration among students and instructors entirely at a distance, with most students completing the course on discretionary time. This report assesses the effectiveness of AOC-BDL based on student and graduate surveys and identifies best practices for BDL from empirical research and case studies. Results show that the course has a number of strengths and that students were generally satisfied with the course. However, student responses also suggest that improvements are needed to support computer-supported cooperative learning and collaboration in distributed teams, particularly for instruction and collaboration on complex tasks. Furthermore, while students were satisfied with instruction for some operational topics, their responses may indicate needs for improvement in instruction of critical field-grade competencies, such as the military decision making process, problem solving, and communication skills, and in teaching leadership skills corresponding to a range of operational environments. Case studies and the research literature point to a number of best practices and options for improvement. Adding a resident segment may offer the greatest potential for improvement but may not be feasible in this context. Alternatives for improvement include modifying the composition of student teams to alleviate coordination challenges, moving the course delivery platform to a dotcom to improve technology reliability and functionality, and addressing policy to ensure that the chain of command and employers provided dedicated time for students to work on the course.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    The Blended Distributed Learning Advanced Operations Course

  • Chapter Three

    Satisfaction and Perceived Learning Effectiveness in the Blended Distributed Learning Advanced Operations Course

  • Chapter Four

    Literature Review and Case Studies of Blended Distributed Learning

  • Chapter Five

    Conclusions and Options for Improvement

  • Appendix A

    Intermediate-Level Education Advanced Operations Course Blocks, Learning Objectives, and Cognitive Levels of Learning

  • Appendix B

    Psychometric Properties of Exit and Postgraduate Surveys

  • Appendix C

    Proposed Exit Survey Questions

  • Appendix D

    Case Study Interview Questions

主题Educational Technology ; Military Education and Training ; Military Officers ; Organizational Leadership Development ; United States Army
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR172.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/522297
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Susan G. Straus,Michael G. Shanley,Maria C. Lytell,et al. Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills for Army Leaders Using Blended-Learning Methods. 2013.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR172.pdf(662KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1374062418763.gif(6KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Susan G. Straus]的文章
[Michael G. Shanley]的文章
[Maria C. Lytell]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Susan G. Straus]的文章
[Michael G. Shanley]的文章
[Maria C. Lytell]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Susan G. Straus]的文章
[Michael G. Shanley]的文章
[Maria C. Lytell]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR172.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1374062418763.gif
格式: GIF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。