G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
来源IDRR-387-A
Assessing Locally Focused Stability Operations
Jan Osburg; Christopher Paul; Lisa Saum-Manning; Dan Madden; Leslie Adrienne Payne
发表日期2014-08-21
出版年2014
语种英语
结论

Assessment Is a Daunting Task, but a Working Definition of the Mission Can Close the Doctrinal Gap and Challenges Can Be Mitigated by Adhering to Identified Principles

  • Fundamental challenges to assessing LFSO include (1) the inherent complexity of LFSO missions; (2) limited assessment doctrine, training, and guidance; (3) competing visions of stability among stakeholders; (4) the need to combine metrics and assessments across multiple areas and levels; (5) invalid or untested assumptions about causes and effects; (6) bias, conflicts of interest, and other external factors that create perverse incentives; (7) redundant reporting requirements and knowledge-management challenges; (8) the difficulty of continuing the assessment process across deployment cycles; and (9) failure to include host-nation perspectives.
  • The following steps can be used to assess LFSO and similar operations: (1) identify the challenges specific to the scenario; (2) establish the Theory of Change behind the planned operation to help document the expected results and describe how activities and tasks are linked to those results; (3) determine metrics and how and when to collect them; (4) set up processes for data analysis (including aggregation) and communication of results; and (5) develop options for briefing leadership and stakeholders on the assessment plan.
摘要

This report describes how the Army and other services can better measure and assess the progress and outcomes of locally focused stability operations (LFSO), which are defined as the missions, tasks, and activities that build security, governance, and development by, with, and through the directly affected community, in order to increase stability at the local level. A number of issues related to assessing LFSO are identified, along with foundational challenges that include an inherently complex operational environment, limited doctrinal guidance, competing visions of stability, untested assumptions, and redundant or excessive reporting requirements. The report offers solutions to these and other challenges, and provides concrete recommendations and implementation-related guidance for designing and conducting assessments of LFSO. The report concludes with an assessment plan for a notional African LFSO scenario that illustrates the practical application of those insights.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction and Study Methods

  • Chapter Two

    Review of Assessment Approaches in Stability Operations

  • Chapter Three

    Results: Insights and Recommendations

  • Chapter Four

    Applying the Assessment Recommendations in a Practical Scenario

  • Chapter Five

    Conclusions

主题Africa ; Asymmetric Warfare ; Civil-Military Relations ; Global Security ; Land Warfare ; Low-Intensity Conflict ; Peacekeeping and Stability Operations ; Security Cooperation ; United States Army
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR387.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/522545
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Jan Osburg,Christopher Paul,Lisa Saum-Manning,et al. Assessing Locally Focused Stability Operations. 2014.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR387.pdf(740KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1495315140713.jpg(8KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Jan Osburg]的文章
[Christopher Paul]的文章
[Lisa Saum-Manning]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Jan Osburg]的文章
[Christopher Paul]的文章
[Lisa Saum-Manning]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Jan Osburg]的文章
[Christopher Paul]的文章
[Lisa Saum-Manning]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR387.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1495315140713.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。