全球智库信息集成服务系统

Previous Neglect Means Gaps Need to Be Closed

• Countering WMD comprises a mission area of overarching importance.
• Because counter-WMD missions have not been given priority for defense resources, the United States may lack both the capabilities and the capacity required to conduct WMD-elimination operations in, for example, a collapsed state.
• The potential ground force requirements for WMD-E operations could be substantial.

Counter-WMD Efforts Should Be Properly Structured

• The size, complexity and strategic importance of WMD elimination operations will require the dedicated efforts of a joint task force (JTF).
• In addition to special operations forces and technical units, this JTF will require general-purpose forces for security and logistical operations, as well as combat forces if sites must be found and seized in the presence of hostile populations and military forces.
• The number of troops needed can range from as few as 15,000 for small efforts in relatively low-threat environments to more than 270,000 troops for large operations in high-threat environments posing dangers of theft and proliferation. For WMD elimination operations in a collapsed DPRK scenario, our best estimate is 188,000 troops.

Although two successive presidents have determined that weapons of mass destruction (WMD) — particularly nuclear weapons in the hands of violent extremists — pose the greatest threat to the American people, and have decided that countering their proliferation is a top strategic priority, neither administration has made countering WMD a priority when it comes to allocating budgetary resources to that overarching national mission. In the public domain, little analysis exists that assesses the capacity and capabilities required by military forces to conduct WMD elimination (WMD-E) operations. As a result, public discussion of what capabilities the military requires for such operations generally omits or gives short shrift to requirements for the WMD-E mission. The purpose of this report is to address and analyze those requirements, namely, the ground force capacity (force size) and capabilities (force structure) needed to accomplish WMD-E missions and tasks. These analyses provide an informed description of the types and size of U.S. Army forces required to conduct WMD-E operations in a wide range of situations. The authors explore in depth two particularly salient cases: operations to secure loose WMD in the event that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) collapses and a counterfactual scenario in which U.S. operations were ordered to eliminate the Syrian chemical weapons program in the wake of a Syrian regime collapse.

• Chapter One

  Introduction

• Chapter Two

  Gaps Between Countering WMD and Prioritizing Resources

• Chapter Three

  Counter-WMD Missions and WMD-E Operations

• Chapter Four

  Illustrative WMD-E Scenarios and Ground Force Requirements

• Chapter Five

  Concluding Observations

• Appendix A

  Selected National Security Documents and Joint and Service Doctrine

• Appendix B

  DPRK and Syrian WMD Sites

• Appendix C

  Scenario Context for DPRK Case Study

• Appendix D

  Review of Available Estimates on Support Ratio in Iraq