G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
来源IDRR-828-A
Special Warfare: The Missing Middle in U.S. Coercive Options
Dan Madden; Dick Hoffmann; Michael Johnson; Fred Krawchuk; John E. Peters; Linda Robinson; Abby Doll
发表日期2015-01-27
出版年2014
页码8
语种英语
结论

Special Warfare Comes with Advantages...

  • Special warfare can improve U.S. contextual understanding of potential partners and the situation on the ground.
  • Special warfare's small-footprint approach allows the United States to pursue cost-effective, cost-imposing strategies.
  • Given a decision to intervene, policymakers could use special warfare to avoid making commitments beyond U.S. interests.
  • Special warfare's small-footprint approach can be more fiscally and politically sustainable than alternatives when underlying sources of conflict cannot be resolved in the short term.

...As Well as Risks

  • A U.S. partner may have core objectives that conflict with those of the United States.
  • The opponent's level of capability and operational tempo relative to the partner's may render special warfare solutions ineffective within the required time horizon.
  • Some partners may behave in ways that transgress America's normative standards and undermine their own sources of legitimacy.
  • If special warfare campaigns are not carefully integrated into a holistic U.S. policy toward the targeted country, U.S. efforts can either turn into direct conflict or become out of balance.
  • The global proliferation of information technology erodes the ability to keep covert activities covert, which can place the secrecy of operations at risk.

Authors Identified Eight Campaign Types That Might Help Address Current Strategic Challenges

  • Hybrid guerrilla warfare in the defense.
  • Support to conventional power projection.
  • Support to distant blockade.
  • Covert foreign internal defense for eliminating weapons of mass destruction.
  • Counterproliferation against a global network.
  • Foreign internal defense in a fractured state.
  • Building a regional security exporter.
  • Countergenocide unconventional warfare.
摘要

This report demonstrates the need for special warfare, a strategic and operational approach to securing U.S. interests. The U.S. requires new approaches for exerting influence to fill the missing middle between the costly indefinite commitment of conventional forces and the limitations of distant-strike options presented by drones and Tomahawk missiles. Because special warfare works principally through local actors, employs political warfare methods, and requires the integration of a much broader suite of U.S. government agency capabilities than are typically envisioned in conventional campaigns, the United States must adjust its conceptual models for military campaigns to achieve its goals through special warfare.The report has four specific aims: (1) to adapt conventional operational art to the unique characteristics of special warfare, (2) to identify the strategic advantages and risks associated with special warfare, (3) to explore how special warfare campaigns could be used to address challenges identified in strategic guidance, and (4) to provide guidance to military and civilian leaders and planners in designing and executing these campaigns.RAND authors recommend that DoD strengthen its special warfare planning capacity and culture, conduct institutional reforms to facilitate unified action among relevant U.S. government agencies, and place greater emphasis on developing capabilities required to prevail in the human domain.

目录 Special Warfare: The Missing Middle in U.S. Coercive Options | RAND
主题Low-Intensity Conflict ; Military Strategy ; Peacekeeping and Stability Operations ; Special Operations Forces ; Warfare and Military Operations
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR828.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/522665
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Dan Madden,Dick Hoffmann,Michael Johnson,et al. Special Warfare: The Missing Middle in U.S. Coercive Options. 2015.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR828.pdf(138KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1495316337979.jpg.p(5KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Dan Madden]的文章
[Dick Hoffmann]的文章
[Michael Johnson]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Dan Madden]的文章
[Dick Hoffmann]的文章
[Michael Johnson]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Dan Madden]的文章
[Dick Hoffmann]的文章
[Michael Johnson]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR828.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1495316337979.jpg.pagespeed.ic.N3ue3xmkeE.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。