G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
来源IDRR-158-A
Army Global Basing Posture: An Analytic Framework for Maximizing Responsiveness and Effectiveness
Thomas S. Szayna; Paul Dreyer; Derek Eaton; Lisa Saum-Manning
发表日期2015-06-01
出版年2015
页码132
语种英语
结论

Uncertainty in the Security Environment Makes Establishment of Large Forward Bases Difficult to Justify; Smaller Low-Footprint Posture Is Preferable

  • A planning and decision support tool for future Army forward basing choices needs to include an assessment of the political reliability of the host state to ensure unconstrained use of the base.

The Army Has Many Good Choices for Basing Its Forces in All Regions of the World

  • Several specific locations emerged consistently from our analysis as improving responsiveness. Minimal adjustments by upgrading these locations may have substantial impact for robustness of forward presense and ability to respond to crises.
  • Choices regarding new bases depend on assessment of trade-offs between the costs associated with upgrading the facilities at proposed locations and the marginal benefits in responsiveness. Given the limited gains in responsiveness, robustness and strengthening defense relationships provide more valid justifications for the infrastructure improvements that might be needed.
  • Assessing the utility of forward basing locations for purposes of steady-state security cooperation does not offer clear results akin to those for assessing responsiveness; depending on the scope and size of the effort, it is not a given that basing forces in country — other than rotating training teams — is necessary for the effectiveness of security cooperation.
摘要

The U.S. global defense posture — the size, location, types, and capabilities of the U.S. forward-based military forces — is an integral and critical component of the U.S. security strategy, allowing the U.S. military to respond quickly and effectively to threats and contingencies. Forward deployed Army forces and the military infrastructure associated with them play an important role in the ability of Army forces to project power, deter adversaries, and engage with partner forces. As the security environment continues to evolve, the United States needs to assess continuously the applicability of its global defense posture to the emerging needs. This report develops a methodology and a framework for global Army positioning in the context of the global defense posture of the United States. The key element of the framework is the interplay of missions assigned to Army forces, types of bases, and base locations. The report uses the framework to assess U.S. Army forward stationing from a perspective of maximum responsiveness and effectiveness in addressing potential crises and increased security cooperation. The report identifies locations in several states in which either increased or new Army presence may be useful in advancing national security goals. Further action depends on determination of a need for greater robustness, faster responsiveness, or deepening a critical security and defense relationship in a given region. The framework presented in this report could be used by combatant commands for assessing optimal forward presence. The methodology has the potential to be developed further as a decision support tool for DoD's future posture decisions.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Global Posture: Key Elements

  • Chapter Three

    Assessing Utility of Basing Options for Short-Warning Missions

  • Chapter Four

    Assessing Utility of Basing Options for Steady State Requirements

  • Chapter Five

    Findings and Recommendations

  • Appendix A

    Political Reliability and Accessibility Methodology and Findings

  • Appendix B

    Force Packages and Potential Base Locations

  • Appendix C

    Global Posturing Model

主题Base Realignment and Closure ; Military Force Deployment ; Security Cooperation ; United States Army
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR158.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/522768
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Thomas S. Szayna,Paul Dreyer,Derek Eaton,et al. Army Global Basing Posture: An Analytic Framework for Maximizing Responsiveness and Effectiveness. 2015.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR158.pdf(5849KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1495316261419.jpg.p(1KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Thomas S. Szayna]的文章
[Paul Dreyer]的文章
[Derek Eaton]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Thomas S. Szayna]的文章
[Paul Dreyer]的文章
[Derek Eaton]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Thomas S. Szayna]的文章
[Paul Dreyer]的文章
[Derek Eaton]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR158.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1495316261419.jpg.pagespeed.ic.dXOZhjlUbh.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。