全球智库信息集成服务系统

Common Knowledge Confirmed

• Security postures are highly specific to company type, size, etc.; and there often aren't good solutions for smaller businesses.
• Quarantining certain parts of an organization offline can be a useful option.
• Responding to the desire of employees to bring their own devices and connect them to the network creates growing dilemmas.
• Chief information security officers (CISOs) feel that attackers have the upper hand, and will continue to have it.

Reasonable Suppositions Validated

• Customers look to extant tools for solutions even though they do not necessarily know what they need and are certain no magic wand exists.
• CISOs want information on the motives and methods of specific attackers, but there is no consensus on how such information could be used.
• Current cyberinsurance offerings are often seen as more hassle than benefit, only useful in specific scenarios, and providing little return.

Surprising Findings

• A cyberattack's effect on reputation (rather than more direct costs) is the biggest cause of concern for CISOs. The actual intellectual property or data that might be affected matters less than the fact that any intellectual property or data is at risk.
• In general, loss estimation processes are not particularly comprehensive.
• The ability to understand and articulate an organization's risk arising from network penetrations in a standard and consistent matter does not exist and will not exist for a long time.

Cybersecurity is a constant, and, by all accounts growing, challenge. Although software products are gradually becoming more secure and novel approaches to cybersecurity are being developed, hackers are becoming more adept, their tools are better, and their markets are flourishing. The rising tide of network intrusions has focused organizations' attention on how to protect themselves better. This report, the second in a multiphase study on the future of cybersecurity, reveals perspectives and perceptions from chief information security officers; examines the development of network defense measures — and the countermeasures that attackers create to subvert those measures; and explores the role of software vulnerabilities and inherent weaknesses. A heuristic model was developed to demonstrate the various cybersecurity levers that organizations can control, as well as exogenous factors that organizations cannot control. Among the report's findings were that cybersecurity experts are at least as focused on preserving their organizations' reputations as protecting actual property. Researchers also found that organizational size and software quality play significant roles in the strategies that defenders may adopt. Finally, those who secure networks will have to pay increasing attention to the role that smart devices might otherwise play in allowing hackers in. Organizations could benefit from better understanding their risk posture from various actors (threats), protection needs (vulnerabilities), and assets (impact). Policy recommendations include better defining the role of government, and exploring information sharing responsibilities.

• Chapter One

  Introduction

• Chapter Two

  Chief Information Security Officers Surveyed

• Chapter Three

  The Efficacy of Security Systems

• Chapter Four

  Improving Software

• Chapter Five

  A Heuristic Cybersecurity Model

• Chapter Six

  Lessons for Organizations and Public Policy

• Appendix A

  Questionnaire

• Appendix B

  Model Specification

• Appendix C

  Baseline Parameters