Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1350 |
来源ID | RR-1350-NHSE |
Future evaluation of the Integrated Personal Commissioning programme: Mapping the logic and assessing evaluability | |
Megan Sim; Catherine L. Saunders; Eleanor Winpenny; Tom Ling | |
发表日期 | 2015-12-31 |
出版年 | 2016 |
页码 | 47 |
语种 | 英语 |
结论 | Within IPC there were three core streams of activity leading to desired outcomes.These three streams are around empowered individuals, sustainable commissioning and a vibrant market of providers. The main impact agreed across sites was the improved quality of life for patients and their carers. Reduced institutional and acute care, and more efficient use of money and resources, were also identified across sites as overall impacts for IPC. There are differences in how well prepared each site is for an evaluation.All are in a position to draw upon and adapt the generic theory of change model and therefore have a model that can be evaluated. However, each site has recognised that they are unlikely to get it right the first time and that they will want to adapt and improve their activities. |
摘要 | The Integrated Personal Commissioning (IPC) Programme is a new programme that joins up health and social care funding for individuals with complex needs and gives them greater control over how their combined health and social care budget is used. Nine demonstrator sites have been selected for the first wave of roll-out, which began on 1 April 2015. ,RAND Europe was invited by NHS England to provide support for the nine demonstrator sites, and at the national level, in collaboration with the NHS England team at this early stage of roll-out. RAND Europe carried out a workshop with each site to support the development of the logic model behind their local plans, and to identify suitable metrics to measure local progress against these logic models. With the national team, RAND Europe used this learning from the workshops to help define how to evaluate the IPC programme with a common logic model, and provide advice for evaluation going forward. ,We found that there are differences in how well prepared each site is for an evaluation, though all are in a position to draw upon and adapt the generic theory of change model and therefore have a model that can be evaluated. Ongoing evaluation could help produce site-level data to support local decision-makers and also support future decision-making nationally. Both of these aims would be supported by common measurements collected across the sites, and by a comparative evaluation. |
目录 |
|
主题 | Health Care Program Evaluation ; Integrative Medicine ; Patient Experience |
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1350.html |
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/522928 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Megan Sim,Catherine L. Saunders,Eleanor Winpenny,et al. Future evaluation of the Integrated Personal Commissioning programme: Mapping the logic and assessing evaluability. 2015. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
RAND_RR1350.pdf(815KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
1600180836324.jpg(4KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | ![]() 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。