G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR1350
来源IDRR-1350-NHSE
Future evaluation of the Integrated Personal Commissioning programme: Mapping the logic and assessing evaluability
Megan Sim; Catherine L. Saunders; Eleanor Winpenny; Tom Ling
发表日期2015-12-31
出版年2016
页码47
语种英语
结论

Within IPC there were three core streams of activity leading to desired outcomes.

These three streams are around empowered individuals, sustainable commissioning and a vibrant market of providers. The main impact agreed across sites was the improved quality of life for patients and their carers. Reduced institutional and acute care, and more efficient use of money and resources, were also identified across sites as overall impacts for IPC.

There are differences in how well prepared each site is for an evaluation.

All are in a position to draw upon and adapt the generic theory of change model and therefore have a model that can be evaluated. However, each site has recognised that they are unlikely to get it right the first time and that they will want to adapt and improve their activities.

摘要

The Integrated Personal Commissioning (IPC) Programme is a new programme that joins up health and social care funding for individuals with complex needs and gives them greater control over how their combined health and social care budget is used. Nine demonstrator sites have been selected for the first wave of roll-out, which began on 1 April 2015.

,

RAND Europe was invited by NHS England to provide support for the nine demonstrator sites, and at the national level, in collaboration with the NHS England team at this early stage of roll-out. RAND Europe carried out a workshop with each site to support the development of the logic model behind their local plans, and to identify suitable metrics to measure local progress against these logic models. With the national team, RAND Europe used this learning from the workshops to help define how to evaluate the IPC programme with a common logic model, and provide advice for evaluation going forward.

,

We found that there are differences in how well prepared each site is for an evaluation, though all are in a position to draw upon and adapt the generic theory of change model and therefore have a model that can be evaluated. Ongoing evaluation could help produce site-level data to support local decision-makers and also support future decision-making nationally. Both of these aims would be supported by common measurements collected across the sites, and by a comparative evaluation.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Context and introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Rationale for logic models

  • Chapter Three

    Logic model development

  • Chapter Four

    Evaluation design

  • Chapter Five

    Discussion

主题Health Care Program Evaluation ; Integrative Medicine ; Patient Experience
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1350.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/522928
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Megan Sim,Catherine L. Saunders,Eleanor Winpenny,et al. Future evaluation of the Integrated Personal Commissioning programme: Mapping the logic and assessing evaluability. 2015.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR1350.pdf(815KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1600180836324.jpg(4KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Megan Sim]的文章
[Catherine L. Saunders]的文章
[Eleanor Winpenny]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Megan Sim]的文章
[Catherine L. Saunders]的文章
[Eleanor Winpenny]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Megan Sim]的文章
[Catherine L. Saunders]的文章
[Eleanor Winpenny]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR1350.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1600180836324.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。