Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR381 |
来源ID | RR-381-A |
Toppling the Taliban: Air-Ground Operations in Afghanistan, October 2001–June 2002 | |
Walter L. Perry; David Kassing | |
发表日期 | 2016-01-04 |
出版年 | 2015 |
语种 | 英语 |
结论 | Joint action at the lowest echelons proved effective in Afghanistan
The type and scale of operations in Afghanistan were unanticipated and were conducted in a harsh, demanding environment.
Unmanned aerial vehicles proved their worth in Afghanistan.
Coordination of special operations forces (SOF) and conventional forces caused some problems.
The initial focus of the Coalition Joint Civil-Military Operations Task Force on humanitarian aid delayed it from providing more traditional civil affairs assistance.
Light forces played a dominant role in Afghanistan because of an elusive enemy operating in rugged terrain.
|
摘要 | The September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks caught the United States without a plan for military operations in Afghanistan. In less than 30 days, the Department of Defense created a plan that involved an unprecedented combination of special operations forces (SOF), Afghan fighters, and airpower. Operations were initiated on October 7, and Afghanistan's Taliban government was toppled in less than two months. An interim administration was installed on December 22, and civil-military operations began. This report describes the preparations for Operation Enduring Freedom at CENTCOM and elsewhere, Army operations and support activities, building a coalition, and civil-military operations in Afghanistan through the end of June 2002. The research used contemporary records and interviews with key participants to gain authoritative perspectives on events and issues. ,U.S. forces were surprisingly successful in toppling the Taliban. The rigorous preparation of SOF clearly paid off. Air-land operations were decisive. Small-unit soldiers and leaders passed the tests of the harsh Afghan environment. Force protection, logistics operations, and communications each worked well. Nonetheless, several problems emerged. Joint planning and training needed to be pushed to lower levels, underscoring the need for the Army to jointly plan the employment of its fire support assets. Other issues included logistics procedures for small operations and civil-military organization and procedures. Many of these issues were later addressed by Army leaders. , |
目录 |
|
主题 | Afghanistan ; Civil-Military Relations ; Military Strategy ; September 11 ; 2001 Terrorist Attacks ; United States Air Force ; United States Army |
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR381.html |
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/522933 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Walter L. Perry,David Kassing. Toppling the Taliban: Air-Ground Operations in Afghanistan, October 2001–June 2002. 2016. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
RAND_RR381.pdf(3912KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
x1495315139334.jpg.p(4KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Walter L. Perry]的文章 |
[David Kassing]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Walter L. Perry]的文章 |
[David Kassing]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Walter L. Perry]的文章 |
[David Kassing]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。