G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR381
来源IDRR-381-A
Toppling the Taliban: Air-Ground Operations in Afghanistan, October 2001–June 2002
Walter L. Perry; David Kassing
发表日期2016-01-04
出版年2015
语种英语
结论

Joint action at the lowest echelons proved effective in Afghanistan

  • Air-land operations were effective both in the initial campaign to destroy the Taliban regime and in the ensuing hunt for the remnants of al Qaeda and the Taliban.

The type and scale of operations in Afghanistan were unanticipated and were conducted in a harsh, demanding environment.

  • At the time, existing support locations were far away, and Afghanistan lacked the infrastructure to support the necessary logistics sustainment effort.
  • A flexible information system helped ensure that supply systems supporting operations in Afghanistan were able to adapt quickly and respond to rapid and frequent changes in supply delivery points.

Unmanned aerial vehicles proved their worth in Afghanistan.

  • The success of the Predator and Global Hawk UAVs prompted the services to modify and expand their plans for UAVs.

Coordination of special operations forces (SOF) and conventional forces caused some problems.

  • SOF often depend on air support for their very survival, yet they were not well integrated with tactical air controllers.
  • SOF learned how to call in air support but were not versed in air platforms and weapons. For this, they depended on tactical air control parties, but there were not enough of these at their home stations to meet all requirements, neither were they adequately equipped to support SOF.

The initial focus of the Coalition Joint Civil-Military Operations Task Force on humanitarian aid delayed it from providing more traditional civil affairs assistance.

  • Tension existed between its mandate to carry out aid and assistance projects and the desire to limit the number of U.S. forces in Afghanistan.
  • Additionally, it would have been helpful to deploy civil affairs troops in theater early, but the active force has relatively little civil affairs force structure.

Light forces played a dominant role in Afghanistan because of an elusive enemy operating in rugged terrain.

  • The Army's Special Forces played a central role in toppling the Taliban and hunting for al Qaeda.
  • Coalition forces frequently relied on helicopters to negotiate Afghanistan's difficult terrain.
  • The Army's light infantry and air-mobile forces were also well suited to operations in Afghanistan. Ultimately, only dismounted infantry could pursue al Qaeda into its mountainous lairs.
  • The Army could not have accomplished its mission in Afghanistan without light forces, both special operations and conventional forces.
摘要

The September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks caught the United States without a plan for military operations in Afghanistan. In less than 30 days, the Department of Defense created a plan that involved an unprecedented combination of special operations forces (SOF), Afghan fighters, and airpower. Operations were initiated on October 7, and Afghanistan's Taliban government was toppled in less than two months. An interim administration was installed on December 22, and civil-military operations began. This report describes the preparations for Operation Enduring Freedom at CENTCOM and elsewhere, Army operations and support activities, building a coalition, and civil-military operations in Afghanistan through the end of June 2002. The research used contemporary records and interviews with key participants to gain authoritative perspectives on events and issues.

,

U.S. forces were surprisingly successful in toppling the Taliban. The rigorous preparation of SOF clearly paid off. Air-land operations were decisive. Small-unit soldiers and leaders passed the tests of the harsh Afghan environment. Force protection, logistics operations, and communications each worked well. Nonetheless, several problems emerged. Joint planning and training needed to be pushed to lower levels, underscoring the need for the Army to jointly plan the employment of its fire support assets. Other issues included logistics procedures for small operations and civil-military organization and procedures. Many of these issues were later addressed by Army leaders.

,

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Laying the Groundwork

  • Chapter Three

    Toppling the Taliban

  • Chapter Four

    Hunting Down Taliban and Al Qaeda Remnants

  • Chapter Five

    Building for the Long Run

  • Chapter Six

    Conclusions and Recommendations

  • Chapter Seven

    Epilogue

主题Afghanistan ; Civil-Military Relations ; Military Strategy ; September 11 ; 2001 Terrorist Attacks ; United States Air Force ; United States Army
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR381.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/522933
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Walter L. Perry,David Kassing. Toppling the Taliban: Air-Ground Operations in Afghanistan, October 2001–June 2002. 2016.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR381.pdf(3912KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1495315139334.jpg.p(4KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Walter L. Perry]的文章
[David Kassing]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Walter L. Perry]的文章
[David Kassing]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Walter L. Perry]的文章
[David Kassing]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR381.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1495315139334.jpg.pagespeed.ic.JHbd-uVws9.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。