Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1051 |
来源ID | RR-1051-OSD |
Air Defense Options for Taiwan: An Assessment of Relative Costs and Operational Benefits | |
Michael J. Lostumbo; David R. Frelinger; James Williams; Barry Wilson | |
发表日期 | 2016-04-05 |
出版年 | 2016 |
语种 | 英语 |
结论 | People's Liberation Army (PLA) Capabilities Force Taiwan to Substantially Rethink and Restructure Its Air Defense Because Taiwan's Fighter Force Faces a Trio of Problems
Surface-to-Air Missiles' Survivability Makes Them a Preferred Option
Taiwan Needs More-Mobile and Shorter-Range Air Defense Systems
Taiwan Can Afford New SAM Investments If It Divests Some of Its Existing Fighter Aircraft Fleet
|
摘要 | Taiwan faces one of the most difficult air defense problems in the world. Because of that, it cannot easily look to how other nations have invested in air defenses to guide its force structure decisions. What makes Taiwan's air defense problem so difficult is the combination of its proximity to China and the massive investments that the People's Republic of China has made in a range of systems that threaten Taiwan's aircraft. China's fighter aircraft capabilities have surpassed those of Taiwan in the air. Furthermore, China now has the capability to destroy all of Taiwan's aircraft at their bases. Thus, Taiwan needs to rethink how it can accomplish its air defense goals. Fighter aircraft are not the only element of Taiwan's air defense; surface-to-air missiles are the other major element. This report analyzes how Taiwan might approach air defense, by downsizing and shifting its fighter aircraft force to focus on coercive scenarios, increasing its investment in surface-to-air missiles, and dedicating its surface-based air defense to becoming an enduring warfighting capability able to contribute throughout the duration of a sustained and effective defense of Taiwan. It describes the essential air defense problem posed by the People's Liberation Army, characterizes the current capabilities and level of funding that Taiwan invests in air defense, and then develops several alternative investment strategies. The authors then test those investment strategies in three vignettes that span the range of conflict, from quite limited coercive uses of force to a full invasion. |
目录 |
|
主题 | Air Defense ; Military Force Planning ; Taiwan |
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1051.html |
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/522997 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Michael J. Lostumbo,David R. Frelinger,James Williams,et al. Air Defense Options for Taiwan: An Assessment of Relative Costs and Operational Benefits. 2016. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
RAND_RR1051.pdf(7871KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
x1495298424109.jpg.p(6KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。