G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR1489
来源IDRR-1489-EPIM
Evaluation of EPIM III: 2012-2015
Joachim Krapels; Emma Disley; Jennie Corbett; Emily Scraggs; Ben Baruch
发表日期2016-04-06
出版年2016
页码101
语种英语
结论

Overall achievements

  • The evaluation found that the overall achievements of EPIM III are substantial and have taken place against the backdrop of a difficult political climate. Although aggregating and summing the achievements of the grantees into a single statement about the results of EPIM III is challenging (given the very diverse nature of the projects undertaken by the grantees, their objectives and approaches), a number of programme level outcomes and impacts were identified.

Capacity building

  • EPIM III resulted in capacity-building outcomes and development among all grantees, but particularly among newer and less mature organisations. Capacity building of grantees was central to the EPIM 'funding plus' model. All grantees evidenced outcomes of increased capacity to conduct research, to run advocacy and awareness campaigns and to influence stakeholders. However, for newer organisations the EPIM III grants enabled them to substantially build capacity. Workshops and conferences organised by EPIM provided grantees with valuable networking opportunities. Such linkages were welcomed by grantees and appeared to have helped grantees to achieve their outcomes and impacts, not just at the national, but also at the European level.

Delivering benefits to individuals

  • Through the work of some grantees, EPIM III was able to deliver benefits to individual migrants and asylum seekers. These outcomes were primarily as a result of direct service delivery by grantees, or as a result of grantees' engagement with professionals (such as healthcare workers) who were themselves working directly with migrants and asylum seekers.
摘要

The European Programme for Integration and Migration (EPIM) is a group of European Foundations who pool funding in order to pursue a shared mission: to strengthen civil society organisations in their efforts to advocate for constructive approaches to migration in Europe. This is done through grant-making, capacity development and networking. Between 2005 and 2015, 17 foundations contributed funding to EPIM, together providing €7.2 million of funding for grants. In 2012 EPIM commissioned RAND Europe to undertake an evaluation of their third funding round, which operated between 2012 and 2015. The aims of the evaluation of EPIM III were to:

,

Grants in EPIM III were awarded to ten organisations working in the areas of asylum seekers, undocumented migrants and in relation to equality, integration and social inclusion of vulnerable migrants. The evaluation of EPIM looked for the contribution made by grantees and by EPIM III as there was a clear understanding that it would not be possible to attribute changes in policy or practice directly to grantees' work under the EPIM III programme. The evaluation found that the overall achievements of EPIM III are substantial and have taken place against the backdrop of a difficult political climate.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction and background

  • Chapter Two

    The achievements of the EPIM III programme as a whole

  • Chapter Three

    Progress of grantees in achieving outputs, outcomes and impacts

  • Chapter Four

    Cross-cutting insights and lessons learned for grantees and funders

  • Chapter Five

    Conclusions and recommendations for future monitoring and evaluation of grant-funding programmes

  • Appendix A

    EPIM logic model

  • Appendix B

    Grantee progress summaries

  • Appendix C

    Short survey results

主题Capacity Building ; European Union ; Forced Migration ; Immigration and Emigration ; Program Evaluation
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1489.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/522999
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Joachim Krapels,Emma Disley,Jennie Corbett,et al. Evaluation of EPIM III: 2012-2015. 2016.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR1489.pdf(1654KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1495316296178.jpg(9KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Joachim Krapels]的文章
[Emma Disley]的文章
[Jennie Corbett]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Joachim Krapels]的文章
[Emma Disley]的文章
[Jennie Corbett]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Joachim Krapels]的文章
[Emma Disley]的文章
[Jennie Corbett]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR1489.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1495316296178.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。