G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR1430
来源IDRR-1430-OSD
SMART Security Cooperation Objectives: Improving DoD Planning and Guidance
Michael J. McNerney; Jefferson P. Marquis; S. Rebecca Zimmerman; Ariel Klein
发表日期2016-05-05
出版年2016
语种英语
结论

Evaluation of Combatant Command Security Cooperation Objectives

  • Most individual country objectives did not meet the SMART criteria of being specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and results-oriented, and time-bound. In particular, most objectives were not yet measureable or time-bound, and their achievability could not be determined.
  • Combatant command security cooperation planning was "SMARTer" than individual country objectives. Although most country plan objectives failed the SMART test, country plans overall and other supporting documents showed more-positive results.
  • Combatant command security cooperation planning could benefit from greater standardization. Combatant commands have different objective hierarchies, and they do not define their terms in the same way.
  • Responsibility and priority for developing country objectives differed by combatant command.
  • Understanding of the SMART concept varied among stakeholders. For the most part, communication of the SMART concept was informal and ad hoc.
  • SMART objectives did not adequately serve as a foundation for security cooperation assessment, monitoring, and evaluation. The entire security cooperation planning system needs to follow a SMART approach, with different levels of detail linking broad end states to concrete tasks.
摘要

Translating security cooperation goals into effective action is challenging, given the multitude of stakeholders, changing political and security environments, and resource limitations. To help ensure that limited security cooperation resources are properly directed for greatest effect, the U.S. Department of Defense has highlighted the need to develop security cooperation objectives that are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and results-oriented, and time-bound (SMART). The SMART concept has been used for several decades in the private sector to develop objectives that facilitate assessment, monitoring, and evaluation.

,

This report evaluates DoD's effectiveness in developing SMART security cooperation objectives. It also proposes a systematic approach to developing security cooperation objectives for use by policymakers, planners, program managers, and resource managers. The authors present a detailed evaluation of the extent to which the security cooperation objectives used by U.S. European Command, U.S. Pacific Command, and U.S. Southern Command meet the SMART criteria, and they recommend changes to improve DoD security cooperation guidance and planning.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Why Aren't SMART Objectives Enough?

  • Chapter Three

    PACOM Findings

  • Chapter Four

    EUCOM Findings

  • Chapter Five

    SOUTHCOM Findings

  • Chapter Six

    Findings and Recommendations

  • Appendix

    SMART Country Planning

主题Military Force Planning ; Program Evaluation ; Security Cooperation ; United States Department of Defense
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1430.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523026
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Michael J. McNerney,Jefferson P. Marquis,S. Rebecca Zimmerman,et al. SMART Security Cooperation Objectives: Improving DoD Planning and Guidance. 2016.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR1430.pdf(4304KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1495316293489.jpg(3KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Michael J. McNerney]的文章
[Jefferson P. Marquis]的文章
[S. Rebecca Zimmerman]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Michael J. McNerney]的文章
[Jefferson P. Marquis]的文章
[S. Rebecca Zimmerman]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Michael J. McNerney]的文章
[Jefferson P. Marquis]的文章
[S. Rebecca Zimmerman]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR1430.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1495316293489.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。