G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR1283
来源IDRR-1283-DH
Evaluation of the Offender Liaison and Diversion Trial Schemes
Emma Disley; Celia Taylor; Kristy Kruithof; Eleanor Winpenny; Mark Liddle; Alex Sutherland; Richard Lilford; Sam Wright; Lyndsay McAteer; Viv Francis
发表日期2016-07-12
出版年2016
页码157
语种英语
结论

The implementation of the National Model for L&D had resulted in significant changes in all ten sites.

  • The National Model was, on the whole, implemented by the second year of operation across all ten sites.

The implementation of the National Model had a range of positive benefits.

  • These included an increase in the total number of people being identified with vulnerabilities and an increase in relevant and timely information available to police, courts and partner agencies.

New L&D support workers were seen as a strength of the National Model.

  • Support workers provided important 'hands-on' practical help to service users and supporting engagement and referrals. They also provided vital reassurance to service users in custody or in court and motivated them to accept support.

Partnerships between police and L&D services were generally strong and the L&D service was valued in the custody suite.

There were some schemes which faced implementation challenges.

  • These were mainly service user engagement and ensuring consistency in the quality of reports from the L&D service.

Overall, the vast majority of stakeholders, across the range of partnership agencies, reported that the information provided by L&D services was useful.

摘要

Liaison and diversion (L&D) schemes operate primarily in police custody suites and courts and aim to identify and assess people with vulnerabilities as they pass through the criminal justice system, to ensure their needs are identified.

,

L&D services have been operating in England for at least 25 years. Not all areas have L&D services and among those that do, there is considerable variation in the nature of the services. In 2009, Lord Bradley reviewed the provision of services for people with mental health problems and learning disabilities in the criminal justice system and recommended that a national L&D model be created. Between 2011 and 2013, the Department of Health was supported by an external partner, the Offender Health Collaborative, to develop a national L&D model.

,

The aims of the National Model are to: Improve access to healthcare and support services for vulnerable individuals and a reduction in health inequalities; divert individuals, where appropriate, out of the youth and criminal justice systems into health, social care or other supportive services; deliver efficiencies within the youth and criminal justice systems; and reduce reoffending or escalation of offending behaviours. In April 2014 a new model for L&D schemes was implemented in ten areas of England.

,

An evaluation was commissioned by the Department of Health to look at the implementation of the new model in these sites, and to investigate any impacts on the criminal justice process, impacts on local organisations and impacts on the health and criminal justice outcomes of service users.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Background to the Offender Liaison and Diversion Trial

  • Chapter Two

    The evaluation of the liaison and diversion trial

  • Chapter Three

    Findings regarding the implementation of the National Model for liaison and diversion

  • Chapter Four

    A description of adult cases in the first year of the trial

  • Chapter Five

    A description of youth cases in the first year of the trial

  • Chapter Six

    Working with partners and making referrals

  • Chapter Seven

    Impacts of the National Model for liaison and diversion

  • Chapter Eight

    Cost-benefit analysis of the National Model compared to local L&D models

  • Chapter Nine

    Service user views on the L&D service

  • Chapter Ten

    Conclusions

  • Appendix A

    Description of the Adult L&D population (April 2014 to March 2015)

  • Appendix B

    Further information about the economic evaluation

  • Appendix C

    Fields in the Minimum Data Set

  • Appendix D

    Evaluation and Data collection approaches investigated in the scoping and feasibility stage

  • Appendix E

    Overview of data collected in each area

  • Appendix F

    Survey instruments

主题Courts ; Health Care Access ; Law Enforcement ; Mental Health and Illness ; Social Services and Welfare ; United Kingdom
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1283.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523083
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Emma Disley,Celia Taylor,Kristy Kruithof,et al. Evaluation of the Offender Liaison and Diversion Trial Schemes. 2016.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR1283.pdf(1036KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1495316193792.jpg.p(4KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Emma Disley]的文章
[Celia Taylor]的文章
[Kristy Kruithof]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Emma Disley]的文章
[Celia Taylor]的文章
[Kristy Kruithof]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Emma Disley]的文章
[Celia Taylor]的文章
[Kristy Kruithof]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR1283.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1495316193792.jpg.pagespeed.ic.uethkUmFpV.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。